They are probably part of the same DNC/Obama White House paid disrupters.
One of the real disappointments of the media, and my main reason for hating them, is their inability to hide their openly biased efforts to cover up the truth.
Webster defines terrorism as “The systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.”
They also define protester as a person with a complaint, objection, or display of unwillingness usually to an idea or a course of action.
The definition for criminal act is an act committed in violation of the law where the consequence of conviction by a court is punishment, especially where the punishment is a serious one such as imprisonment.
It is very obvious where I am going here. When the “protesting” group reverts to violence and threats, they are not protesters, but terrorists, and should be treated accordingly. If any form of violence starts from their ranks, and they are contributory, they go to jail and pay a brisk fine. It is their responsibility as organized protesters to curtail their violence. If people around them get violent, they should be treated the same way. They now become terrorists.
Protester are not terrorists. But on the same pretense, terrorist are. Call them what they are. They are not defendable. They committed a criminal act. Identify them for being the criminals they are and treat them accordingly. And the first step is to educate the public in their actions. Burn the media every time they do this. They are assisting it.
red