Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump clamps down on federal agencies
The Hill ^ | January 24, 2017 | Jordan Fabian

Posted on 01/24/2017 5:32:05 PM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Many rank-and-file federal employees, likewise, are not enamored with their new boss. They preferred Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton over Trump by a 2-1 margin, according to a recent Government Business Council/GovExec.com poll.

Twenty-eight percent said they would even consider leaving the federal workforce entirely now that Trump is president.

THAT IS DEFINITELY NOT A BAD THING!

1 posted on 01/24/2017 5:32:05 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

President Trump should confiscate the 1.5 billion rounds the EPA ,DOE,and other noncombatant agencies procured and distribute them to the voters ala government cheese.


2 posted on 01/24/2017 5:36:23 PM PST by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
The EPA restriction caught the attention of Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), who tweeted Tuesday afternoon that the ban on social media and contact with reporters was “very troubling —and honestly, anti-democratic.”

Nobody votes for the bureaucracy.

The people do, however, elect the President.

3 posted on 01/24/2017 5:36:32 PM PST by Haiku Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Oh my goodness!!! They actually are expected to do what their boss says? Horrors!


4 posted on 01/24/2017 5:36:49 PM PST by DesertRhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

DoD is already under these rules. It’s time these alphabet agencies were gotten under control.


5 posted on 01/24/2017 5:37:05 PM PST by Seruzawa (I keel you Vorga feelthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Stifling dissenting views? Dissenting views are appropriate in the courts or Congress. Not for the bureaucracy.


6 posted on 01/24/2017 5:37:34 PM PST by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
At the EPA, staffers were ordered to stop issuing press releases, blog updates and social media posts, according to a memo to employees. The Agriculture Department’s research arm was reportedly told by its chief of staff to stop issuing news releases, photos and other “public-facing” documents

This order does not and cannot suppress the expression of personal views, but the government has the authority to control the use of government resources to express official policy of the government. Individual staff members at the EPA are entitled to their personal views, can write their congresscritters, etc. but they cannot use government owned media to express "official" dissent from the official policies of the government.

7 posted on 01/24/2017 5:37:44 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter

These agencies probably did not procure this much ammo.

The computerized procurement systems used by the federal government require the buyer to choose from a list of thousands of object codes, so they can keep track of what they buy.

The very first code on the list is, you guessed it, ammo.

So if the purchaser does not choose an object code, the purchase is encoded, by default, as ammunition in the database of federal purchases.


8 posted on 01/24/2017 5:39:42 PM PST by Haiku Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), who tweeted Tuesday afternoon that the ban on social media and contact with reporters was “very troubling —and honestly, anti-democratic.””

Let one of her underlings tweet against California gun laws and say to build a wall. Then we’ll see how “democratic” she is.


9 posted on 01/24/2017 5:39:56 PM PST by DesertRhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This ain’t a democracy, you dummy! It’s a bureaucracy and it works for one man, who makes the rules. Nobody has the right to make “public facing comments” on behalf of their employer and does so at his/her/its own peril. Want to see how if feels to lose that nice cushy government pension? Just try crossing Trump on this.

Day 2. The Adults are back in charge.


10 posted on 01/24/2017 5:43:29 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
New restrictions on social media use and interaction with press and lawmakers at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services, Agriculture and the Interior have sparked concerns of a President Trump-backed effort to silence dissenting views.

The author of this silly piece, Jordan Fabian, is either 29 or 30 years old, and knows very little about how the world works.

There is very little room in the executive branch for "dissenting voices," and any "dissent" flows along very narrow channels.

There is absolutely no room for "dissenting views" that are expressed from sources inside agencies to news organizations, or anyone else outside the agency. Zero. Nada. Nothing.

Stating such a policy, and further stating that individuals who choose to act in opposition to the policy will face severe punishments, is not a violation of anyone's rights. It is not a scandal, it is not a suppression of the right to dissent or to speak out. It is not a violation of the First Amendment, or anything else.

It is simply normal practice in any organization, public or private.

You want to complain, or talk out of school to the fake-news MSM, you can resign and then talk all you want. Subject to limitations you may have agreed to when you accepted the job, concerning confidential, classified, or proprietary information to which you had access as part of your work duties.

11 posted on 01/24/2017 5:44:41 PM PST by Steely Tom (Liberals think in propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Exactly...Public employees expressing their opinions on their own time is guaranteed by the First Amendment but it doesn’t give them the right to divulge official business on government time.


12 posted on 01/24/2017 5:44:46 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
It is simply normal practice in any organization, public or private.

Well said.

13 posted on 01/24/2017 5:48:16 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Go President Trump!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

14 posted on 01/24/2017 5:54:20 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Twenty-eight percent said they would even consider leaving the federal workforce entirely now that Trump is president.”

They have even less real job skills than the Follywood rectums, telling the world, they will go to Canada.

These creeps wouldn’t make it in a fast food chain store, cleaning tables and floors.


15 posted on 01/24/2017 5:54:42 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Obama's greatest legacy to America/Americans was the election of President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

Private industry is under these rules.


16 posted on 01/24/2017 5:54:44 PM PST by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: urbanpovertylawcenter

I am allowed to criticize my employer, my working conditions, and company policy on my office computer. NOT!

Not allowed in private or publicly held companies so why should it happen in Government agencies???

MAGA!


17 posted on 01/24/2017 5:57:27 PM PST by wetgundog ("Extremism in the Defense of Liberty is No Vice" -AuH2O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
These are EXECUTIVE AGENCIES.

They are under the authority of the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of the U.S. government.

Donald Trump, as President of the United States, RUNS the Executive Branch of the U.S. government.

According to the U.S. Constitution, Trump controls the policy, output, and work product from all Executive Agencies.

Trump governs all these little cupcakes.

Apparently no one told them this before.

18 posted on 01/24/2017 6:01:26 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Twenty-eight percent said they would even consider leaving the federal workforce entirely now that Trump is president.

I love it when a plan comes together!

19 posted on 01/24/2017 6:02:38 PM PST by DakotaGator (Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You do not “dissent” when you work for the Executive Branch: you undermine.


20 posted on 01/24/2017 6:03:43 PM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson