Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Brexit’ Talks Can’t Start Without Parliament, U.K. Supreme Court Rules
New York Times ^ | Jan 24, 2017 | KATRIN BENNHOLD

Posted on 01/24/2017 5:11:46 AM PST by Truth29

LONDON — Prime Minister Theresa May must secure the approval of Parliament before she can begin the process of taking Britain out of the European Union, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday.

The ruling, which upholds an earlier decision by the High Court in London, creates another hurdle for Mrs. May, who has promised to begin a two-year, irreversible process of exit negotiations by the end of March by invoking the European Union’s Article 50, the legal mechanism for leaving the bloc.

In its ruling, the court noted that Parliament had approved the 1972 legislation that enabled the country to join the European Union and incorporated European law into British law. Leaving the bloc would take away from British citizens a number of rights that had been granted by the bloc.

As a result, “the government cannot trigger Article 50 without an act of Parliament authorizing that course,” David Neuberger, the Supreme Court president, said in announcing the decision, which was approved 8 to 3.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brexit; brexitarticle50; britain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: pepsi_junkie

Could be the first condition is wrong the second is correct that it is unconstitutional to not run this past parliament


21 posted on 01/24/2017 9:21:11 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Could be the first condition is wrong the second is correct that it is unconstitutional to not run this past parliament


22 posted on 01/24/2017 9:21:11 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

They did this last fall, what’s new about this one?


23 posted on 01/24/2017 9:22:26 AM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winniesboy
This ruling simply reasserts the constitutional proprieties.

You can measure the resistance.

24 posted on 01/24/2017 9:26:00 AM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aspasia
"They did this last fall, what’s new about this one?"

This is a higher court and the ruling also concluded that the devolved parliaments would not be involved in the final vote.

25 posted on 01/24/2017 9:53:14 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Thanks for that!


26 posted on 01/24/2017 9:59:50 AM PST by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

They wanted a Supreme Court. Now they’ve finally got one.

House of Lords says: “Miss me yet?”


27 posted on 01/24/2017 10:03:21 AM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aspasia

The resistance seems to be crumbling slowly but surely. This ruling won’t change much other than making Brexit a slightly more messy affair. This won’t fundamentally alter the fact that we are leaving, and appear to be leaving by the Hard Brexit route.


28 posted on 01/24/2017 12:11:22 PM PST by Scottishlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

The way around this?
Court of Appeal, then a Three line whip in the House.
If the Court of Appeal up hold this, the result will almost certainly be the same in the house.
Will be interesting to see if Theresa really has her heart in this or not.


29 posted on 01/24/2017 12:14:24 PM PST by moose07 (DMCS (Dit Me Cong San ) Forward to the glorious world of next Tuesday !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Silverity

There are a lot of remainist Tories and the majority is only a slender one. I think the support of Labour may be needed to guarantee the vote. Corbyn has stated that he will vote to trigger it, but he may demand concessions in return, such as trying to stay in the single market, which is something a lot of Tory Remainers may also try to insist on.


30 posted on 01/25/2017 9:10:00 PM PST by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson