[VanDeKoik]

So the tax coffers are a slush fund?!

[Samurai_Jack]

Is this even legal?

[SSS Two]

May the residents take the $100 as a tax refund? Or is the city specifying that politicians, not residents, are eligible for the money.

[NEMDF]

How does this work? They take $100 from each person in taxes, and then give it back to the person?

This sounds maroonic.

[Flick Lives]

Collect taxes from people.
Give back money to people in form of a “democracy voucher”.
People donate “voucher” to politicians.

---

I think this is called money laundering.

[Huskrrrr]

I’m using my name as a write-in candidate.

[D_Idaho]

Money to burn.

[Army Air Corps]

A person could buy a lot of booze and cigs with $100.

[mrsmith]

If they’re like Food Stamps, and can be redeemed for half their value in drugs, then it’ll be a “success”!

[samtheman]

The Clintons are scheming for a way to list the Foundation as a “local politician”.

[Getready]

The seattle rain has entired and now resides in the brains of the seattle government.

[Captain Compassion]

Buy the vouchers for 50 cents on the dollar from the voters and sell to politicians for 75 cents on the dollar. Everyone wins. Well except the tax payers.

[I want the USA back]

Taxpayer money. This is illegal and wrong.

[BenLurkin]

The addled thought process behind this is truly dismaying.

As if it was conceived by persons under the long term influence of cannabis.

[rockrr]

More insanity from the Seattlunatics.

[School of Rational Thought]

I would give the money to the write in candidate. ;-)

[Organic Panic]

Money laundering. Pure and simple.

[b4me]

if they run good candidates they’d proxy hav emote people open to donating.

what they are doing now seems to be trying to force donations just sio they’re percentage of people donating will go up and they can feel better about the increase in people “participating”

[hal ogen]

Thieves. Lunatics.