[DoughtyOne]

I liked the way she and Trump didn’t mention any names, but talked about past administrations.

LOL

I wonder which ones... (as if)

I hadn’t even heard the term ‘emoluments’ before. (I may have, but it didn’t stick with me if I had)

Then I find out Trump is trying to avoid them.

You see, that’s Obama’s problem. There are things he isn’t even aware of, that he needed to avoid.

I’m not saying he didn’t, because what conflict of interest related to businesses did he have? None.

There are many other concepts that he is unaware of, that are something Trump has dealt with for decades.

Not many people are as sharp as Trump, and > IMO < we are very lucky to have him.

Some folks think of this as fawning on him. I’m actually quite impressed with his abilities, and I’m not ashamed to say so.

That’s why I wanted him and voted for him. This guy is going to amaze us.

IF he doesn’t or goes South, I’ll have to admit it and eat crow, but that’s what my gut instinct is now.

[Steve_Seattle]

The MSM have raised the "conflict of interest" issue as a slogan, without feeling the need to demonstrate any specific conflict of interest; I mean, Trump isn't even in office yet.

And, speaking of conflicts of interest, many of us have seen the chart here on FR that depicts the familial relationships between high-ranking media executives/journalists and Obama administration employees.

The MSM never raise that issue, which is actually a very fundamental conflict of interest, and which is one that I think should be addressed by law. It should be PROHIBITED for relatives (spouses/siblings/parents/children) of influential media employees (whether executives, reporters, or pundits) to be members of a presidential administration.