Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil

“Those in gated communities will be immune to this ordinance, it’s OK”


Which means the ACLU could have a field day with this. It doesn’t sound like “equal protection” to me. ;-)


27 posted on 01/10/2017 6:04:19 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Douglas

I don’t have much use for the ACLU. They are always on the wrong side of battles they choose to fight. In my opinion.


71 posted on 01/10/2017 7:31:09 AM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Douglas; USMCPOP; castlegreyskull; ThunderSleeps; outpostinmass2

One point that everyone seems to be missing is this:

This law is a restriction on honest citizens who are minding their own business. It was created because of CRIMINALS, supposedly to protect citizens from criminals. The real solution would be better policing and rounding up the criminals who steal cars.

In most places, police make no effort whatsoever to recover a stolen car or to catch the thieves. So this law became necessary because of police REFUSING TO ENFORCE already existing laws. By refusing to enforce, they sent the message to car thieves that stealing cars is a low risk enterprise. In effect they have invited the thieves to steal.

When the cops start doing their jobs, the need for stupid laws like this one will go away.


73 posted on 01/10/2017 7:35:05 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson