Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This article is from Oct 2016, but when I posted it on existing threads a lot of folks were somewhat surprised. I guess that's because the snooze media didn't give the story the attention it deserved.
1 posted on 01/07/2017 7:49:57 AM PST by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Oct 2016

WikiLeaks Show How Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta Became ‘Business Partners with Vladimir Putin’

“...WikiLeaks emails provide proof that the “Clintons have a long and lucrative history of financial deals with the Russians, particularly with the Russian government.”

Schweizer explained the “deep ties” the Clintons have to Russia, specifically how in 2010 then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved the sale and transfer of 20% of U.S. uranium output to the Russian government ...”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/22/schweizer-wikileaks-show-clinton-campaign-chair-john-podesta-became-business-partners-vladimir-putin/

2 posted on 01/07/2017 7:50:22 AM PST by ETL (On the road to America's recovery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Who’s in Putin’s Pocket — Clinton or Trump? (Clinton Uranium RussiaGate scandal)

The New American ^ | August 3, 2016 | William F. Jasper

"according to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Guistra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control."

***********************************************

RUSSIAGATE

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission & $500,000 speaking fee (US uranium to Russia)

qura.com ^ | July 27, 2016 | Sierra Spaulding

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission and $500k speaking fee for brokering the sale of 20% of America's uranium deposits to Russia?

You are speaking about a really interesting deal that ended up giving Vladimir Putin and the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. ..."


3 posted on 01/07/2017 7:50:57 AM PST by ETL (On the road to America's recovery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

Very good. What a disgusting group of folk almost got to run the country.

Now, someone needs to inform Mark Zaid, an attorney in DC who has filed a FOIA case, he claims, on behalf of “conservative journalist” Louise Mensch in Britain, who actually worked on HRC’s campaign and wrote the slogan “I’mWithHer” so not clear how she can be “nonpartisan.” Anyway, their theory is that Bannon collaborated with Russia to take down HRC. Ha. HRC didn’t need any help losing anyway!

Mensch really has it in for Bannon, personally. It’s disgusting.


5 posted on 01/07/2017 7:59:32 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

Well nobama did just close up all of that western real estate that has uranium and REE deposits under it.

For the sage grouse of course.

The clintons were all about closing off access to western lands to mining, mainly to make them available to their foreign interests once the heat dies down.

Whos says government sponsored crime doesn’t pay?

It pays off by the truckload.


7 posted on 01/07/2017 8:01:26 AM PST by factoryrat (We reserve the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

Why aren’t these people challenged by Obama’s own words-that fretting about Russia is “eighties thinking”? And what about his disclosure of nuclear secrets and his promise to Putin of more flexibility? And why isn’t he asked if Hillary’s famous ‘reset’ was a failure?


9 posted on 01/07/2017 8:36:39 AM PST by Spok ("What're you going to believe-me or your own eyes?" -Marx (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

16 posted on 01/07/2017 8:47:41 AM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Here’s the must-see interview w/ Matt Lauer on YouTube...

Donald Trump (2014): ‘Vladimir Putin Has Eaten Obama’s Lunch’:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzURUENf1ns

20 posted on 01/07/2017 9:08:40 AM PST by ETL (On the road to America's recovery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL
And here we have the Clintons selling military secrets to China. And to influence the election.


"Lest We Forget Chinagate, The Most Serious Scandal in US History"
http://www.independentsentinel.com/lest-we-forget-hillarys-china-gate-scandal/

the Clinton Administration to transfer technology export licensing authority from the State Department to the more politically-influenced Commerce Department... They ended up advancing China’s missile program which is a threat to US national security


"The China Connection Is the Real Scandal"
http://eagleforum.org/psr/1998/june98/psrjune98.html

A series of front-page news stories in the New York Times (May 15, 16, 17) essentially vindicated Thompson's charge that the Chinese Communist Government tried to influence the 1996 U.S. election with campaign contributions.

Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN) and Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN). Theirs were the committees that were closing in on the China connection, the scandal that can bring down the Clinton presidency, the scandal that has made Congressmen start to utter the T word (treason).

22 posted on 01/07/2017 10:53:07 AM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

President Obama’s Missile Defense Policy: A Misguided Legacy

By Michaela Dodge
Sept 2016

As the ballistic missile threat continues to grow around the world, ballistic missile defense programs remain a quintessential feature of the U.S. national security posture. President Obama’s missile defense policy shifts and program cancellations cost the nation precious time and capabilities at a time when adversaries’ ballistic missile programs are becoming more sophisticated.

The new President in 2017 must avoid missile defense policy confusion, fund missile defense programs adequately, and deploy a comprehensive layered missile defense architecture, including interceptors in space. Heritage Foundation missile defense policy expert Michaela Dodge details the most vital steps for a 21st-century missile defense to protect Americans from a very real threat. ..."

Much more at link...

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2016/09/president-obamas-missile-defense-policy-a-misguided-legacy

or,

https://web.archive.org/web/20170107200441/http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2016/09/president-obamas-missile-defense-policy-a-misguided-legacy

26 posted on 01/07/2017 3:28:42 PM PST by ETL (On the road to America's recovery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

BUMP


27 posted on 02/16/2017 7:24:50 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL; Fedora

Leonidio Holdings?


28 posted on 02/16/2017 7:25:34 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ETL

And, (updating) shortly after the Biden admin won a rendition case against Julian Assange of Wikileaks, and Chuck Schumer is exposed for his Russia connections, Assange has a stroke.


30 posted on 12/15/2021 3:42:18 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson