Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

She is from the Bill O’Reilly style of journalism, after a guest answers her question, she will quickly opine her interpretation of events but slightly under her breath.

Don’t need her. I will skip her show. She gets tiresome and I’d rather have someone else who asks and responds with incisive questions that lead the guests to detail more. No one comes to mind right now.

And no, I do not dislike her because it looks like Roger Ailes hatched her from his Bikini Island laboratory.


11 posted on 01/05/2017 12:29:25 PM PST by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lulu16

oh you’re full of it.


30 posted on 01/05/2017 12:52:05 PM PST by Kaslin (Start by doing what's necessary; then do what's possible; and suddenly you are doing the impossible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: lulu16

> “ No one comes to mind right now.”

I don’t watch TV and don’t have TV programming, preferring to watch internet streaming vids and embeds. Occasionally, I’ll see a newscast that way.

From my occasional sampling of news, I would say definitely, emphatically Katrina Pearson!!!

Other well-knowns would be Greta Van Susteren, Laura Ingraham, Ann Coulter.

Others may be good But I am not sure. There are plenty of smart women who I know could rise to national news but it seems the national news has been trying to sell sexiness via their female news staff.

But back to Katrina Pearson, she and Tucker Carlson share attributes in common.

I’ve been watching vids and embeds of Tucker recently because he’s in the news. I am impressed at how he slices and dices leftists. I can see him working extraordinarily hard and thinking fast on his feet in anticipation of the moves of his leftist guests.

But Tucker is not a conservative per se!

He appears to be conservative because he slays progressives on his show. And he does it after giving them an opportunity to explain themselves. And when they can’t answer his reasonable objective questions, they resort to name-calling, defensive maneuvers, distraction, and Tucker moves to pin them on the original questions they would not answer.

But Tucker would do the same to a guest who is considered or labeled conservative. For example, John McCain calls himself a conservative. John McCain is a liar. True conservatives do not lie (except in a hot war). Therefore, McCain is not a conservative. Tucker would in a respectful way expose McCain’s hypocrisy, his liar nature. Does that make Tucker a liberal?

It is the same with Katrina Pearson. She slices and dices the most vile liars of the left. But she is not necessarily a conservative. She would do the same to those professing to be conservative.

I don’t want to see newscasters who are liberal or conservative. I want to see them as prosecuting trial attorneys who cleverly get key testimony from their guests, testimony which either exposes them as conniving liars or acquits them as coming clean.


58 posted on 01/05/2017 1:45:24 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson