Posted on 01/03/2017 1:37:04 PM PST by Zakeet
A group of more than 1,100 law school professors from across the country is sending a letter to Congress on Tuesday urging the Senate to reject the nomination of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) for attorney general.
The letter, signed by professors from 170 law schools in 48 states, is also scheduled to run as a full-page newspaper ad aimed at members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will be holding confirmation hearings for Sessions on Jan. 10-11.
"We are convinced that Jeff Sessions will not fairly enforce our nation's laws and promote justice and equality in the United States," states the letter, signed by prominent legal scholars including Laurence H. Tribe of Harvard Law School, Geoffrey R. Stone of the University of Chicago Law School, Pamela S. Karlan of Stanford Law School and Erwin Chemerinsky of the University of California, Irvine School of Law.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
That they oppose him is enough for me to support him.
;^)
Agreed. That being said, I have yet to see a law professor who could actually try a case. And most are terrible appellate advocates too. I guess they know too much.
The most unethical lawyers I ever encountered worked for DOJ. Bar none. And sanctimonious on top of it.
So this story will neatly fit the media's narrative, but it has just about as much credibility as Hollywood's opinion on the subject.
actually, these liberal meatheads are concerned that Jeff Sessions will fairly enforce our nation’s laws ...
*************************
Exactly. They don’t think it’s fair for the USA to not treat fraudulently documented foreigners the same as citizens.
That’s what they mean by equality.
Like cockroaches , the numbers astound when you pull the old chalkboard off the wall of academia.
IF these are among the “law professors” who had nothing to say about the activities and actions of the PRESENT Attorney General, then we know why the “legal” profession is as it is today.
In fact, their “opinions” verify Trump’s good choice.
Fine. Let DOJ investigate their accreditation process to see if it was valid.
I see the problem here...
Probably the only thing dumber would be 1,100 fence posts ... but they do provide a useful service.
But of course they had NO problem with Eric Holder....
Those who can, do. Those who can’t, “teach.”
No, Obozo was never a professor of anything, he was a part -time lecturer and what he lectured on was Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky.
He taught rabble-rousing.
It’s great they compile a list of names for the record.
I’d start by prosecuting the nation’s “law professors” fraud in pretending to give the students what they paid for.
I’d start by prosecuting the nation’s “law professors” for fraud; pretending to give their students what they paid for.
And? So? Their point would be?
Does Sari Horwitz and the Compost think that I care what 1000 law professors write about Sessions?
I fart in Bezos general direction.
5.56mm
Eric Holder’s Scandals and Malfeasances:
http://www.whiteoutpress.com/articles/2014/q3/list-attorney-general-eric-holder-scandals/
Contempt of Congress**Black Power**Ft.Hood Cover-Up**Spying on AP and Fox News**War on Gun Owners**Protecting Black Panther voter intimidation**Stimulus Program Fraud**Allowing Illegals to vote** and 30 more, including Fast and Furious.
they never made a peep about anything when Holder and Lynch were stinking up the joint.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.