Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Trump and Putin Avert Cold War II?
Townhall.com ^ | January 3, 2017 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 01/03/2017 7:15:15 AM PST by Kaslin

In retaliation for the hacking of John Podesta and the DNC, Barack Obama expelled 35 Russian diplomats and ordered closure of their country houses on Long Island and Maryland's Eastern shore.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that 35 U.S. diplomats would be expelled. But Vladimir Putin stepped in, declined to retaliate at all, and invited the U.S. diplomats in Moscow and their children to the Christmas and New Year's party at the Kremlin.

"A soft answer turneth away wrath, but grievous words stir up anger," reads Proverbs 15:1. "Great move," tweeted President-elect Trump, "I always knew he was very smart!"

Among our Russophobes, one can almost hear the gnashing of teeth.

Clearly, Putin believes the Trump presidency offers Russia the prospect of a better relationship with the United States. He appears to want this, and most Americans seem to want the same. After all, Hillary Clinton, who accused Trump of being "Putin's puppet," lost.

Is then a Cold War II between Russia and the U.S. avoidable?

That question raises several others.

Who is more responsible for both great powers having reached this level of animosity and acrimony, 25 years after Ronald Reagan walked arm-in-arm with Mikhail Gorbachev through Red Square? And what are the causes of the emerging Cold War II?

Comes the retort: Putin has put nuclear-capable missiles in the Kaliningrad enclave between Poland and Lithuania.

True, but who began this escalation?

George W. Bush was the one who trashed Richard Nixon's ABM Treaty and Obama put anti-missile missiles in Poland. After invading Iraq, George W. Bush moved NATO into the Baltic States in violation of a commitment given to Gorbachev by his father to not move NATO into Eastern Europe if the Red Army withdrew.

Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, says John McCain.

Russia did, after Georgia invaded its breakaway province of South Ossetia and killed Russian peacekeepers. Putin threw the Georgians out, occupied part of Georgia, and then withdrew.

Russia, it is said, has supported Syria's Bashar Assad, bombed U.S.-backed rebels and participated in the Aleppo slaughter.

But who started this horrific civil war in Syria?

Was it not our Gulf allies, Turkey, and ourselves by backing an insurgency against a regime that had been Russia's ally for decades and hosts Russia's only naval base in the Mediterranean?

Did we not exercise the same right of assisting a beleaguered ally when we sent 500,000 troops to aid South Vietnam against a Viet Cong insurgency supported by Hanoi, Beijing and Moscow?

That's what allies do.

The unanswered question: Why did we support the overthrow of Assad when the likely successor regime would have been Islamist and murderously hostile toward Syria's Christians?

Russia, we are told, committed aggression against Ukraine by invading Crimea.

But Russia did not invade Crimea. To secure their Black Sea naval base, Russia executed a bloodless coup, but only after the U.S. backed the overthrow of the pro-Russian elected government in Kiev.

Crimea had belonged to Moscow from the time of Catherine the Great in the 18th century, and the Russia-Ukraine relationship dates back to before the Crusades. When did this become a vital interest of the USA?

As for Putin's backing of secessionists in Donetsk and Luhansk, he is standing by kinfolk left behind when his country broke apart. Russians live in many of the 14 former Soviet republics that are now independent nations.

Has Putin no right to be concerned about his lost countrymen?

Unlike America's elites, Putin is an ethnonationalist in a time when tribalism is shoving aside transnationalism as the force of the future.

Russia, it is said, is supporting right-wing and anti-EU parties. But has not our National Endowment for Democracy backed regime change in the Balkans as well as in former Soviet republics?

We appear to be denouncing Putin for what we did first.

Moreover, the populist, nationalist, anti-EU and secessionist parties in Europe have arisen on their own and are advancing through free elections.

Sovereignty, independence, a restoration of national identity, all appear to be more important to these parties than what they regard as an excessively supervised existence in the soft-dictatorship of the EU.

In the Cold War between Communism and capitalism, the single-party dictatorship and the free society, we prevailed.

But in the new struggle we are in, the ethnonational state seems ascendant over the multicultural, multiethnic, multiracial, multilingual "universal nation" whose avatar is Barack Obama.

Putin does not seek to destroy or conquer us or Europe. He wants Russia, and her interests, and her rights as a great power to be respected.

He is not mucking around in our front yard; we are in his.

The worst mistake President Trump could make would be to let the Russophobes grab the wheel and steer us into another Cold War that could be as costly as the first, and might not end as peacefully.

Reagan's outstretched hand to Gorbachev worked. Trump has nothing to lose by extending his to Vladimir Putin, and much perhaps to win.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: vladimirputin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: lodi90

So you object to “juvenile name calling” by resorting to juvenile name calling?

Truly your hypocrisy knows no bounds.


21 posted on 01/03/2017 8:11:18 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("The political class is a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself" Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin
Did you ever hear of a president that is so possessed with his legacy, as that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave is?

Never. He's the first and hopefully the last. Friggin' Nobel prize went to his head. Carter is smiling right now.

23 posted on 01/03/2017 8:13:52 AM PST by JPX2011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Not really racist, no matter how the msm spin it. I like many of the Chinese people I’ve met, and I’m sure they number in the hundreds by now; and I’m sure, too, I’d get along fine with North Koreans if they could ever un-brainwash themselves, however unlikely that may be.


24 posted on 01/03/2017 8:21:46 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

#2 a petulant little boy who thinks the world revolves around him

You have obama pegged as does Putin.


25 posted on 01/03/2017 8:42:10 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
Not really racist...

You and I know that, but we know as well how the enemedia would depict it.

26 posted on 01/03/2017 8:44:09 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AC Beach Patrol

+1


27 posted on 01/03/2017 8:52:48 AM PST by Bigg Red (To Thee, O Lord, I lift my soul. Thank you for saving our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JPX2011

I didn’t either, and the Nobel prize sure went to his. I am certain that if Alfred Nobel could, he would turn around in his grave.


28 posted on 01/03/2017 9:18:56 AM PST by Kaslin (Start by doing what's necessary; then do what's possible; and suddenly you are doing the impossible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Do you object to globalists being called trash?

I do! My trash is pretty harmless. I haven't seen any evidence of it going around trying to subvert Christian civilization for its own narrow gains. I and my trash would prefer the descriptor "globalist demons".

29 posted on 01/03/2017 9:24:33 AM PST by AC Beach Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

I rejoice in the collapse of globalism. At home and abroad.


You sit in a free country and rejoice in the numerous mass murders by KGB filth. Nothing more hypocritical than that. And that’s why Lenin called your type what he did.


30 posted on 01/03/2017 9:35:08 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

So you object to “juvenile name calling” by resorting to juvenile name calling?

Truly your hypocrisy knows no bounds.


A historically relevant and factual term. Nothing juvenile about it at all.


31 posted on 01/03/2017 9:36:14 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Do you object to globalists being called trash?


No, I object to supporters of one party state fascist Russia smearing those who oppose mass murdering KGB filth as globalists.


32 posted on 01/03/2017 9:46:35 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

So your response to having your imbecilic infantile behavior pointed out is to be even more imbecilic and infantile?

Clue for you child, stop digging. Trolling only works for those with subtly and wit. You are so lacking in both it renders your sad pathetic attempts at trolling ineffective.


33 posted on 01/03/2017 9:54:25 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("The political class is a bureaucracy designed to perpetuate itself" Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
... In retaliation for the hacking of John Podesta and the DNC, ...

BS! Russia didn't do it.

And the DNC insider who gave Wikileaks the emails has been murdered by the Clinton machine.

What would clean this fake news up in a hurry is:

for Trump on Inauguration Day, to grant Assange complete immunity, and have him explain to the whole world, the source of his information, and the crimes committed by the Clinton cartel and the Democrat Party.

34 posted on 01/03/2017 10:05:50 AM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Cry some more.

Watching neocons reduced to puddles of tears and snot is a hobby of mine.


35 posted on 01/03/2017 1:04:39 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Deplorable and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Watching neocons reduced to puddles of tears and snot is a hobby of mine.


LOL. I didn’t lose. You lost. RNC Rinse is Chief of Staff and Trump’s cabinet is full of globalists. Their Senate hearings will be a blast. Get your popcorn. LMAO.


36 posted on 01/03/2017 3:24:42 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Nothing subtle about you “conservative” supporters of KGB Vlad. He’s as anti-American as the globalists. And in bed with death to America Iran. But he does have better pecs I suppose. Where is that Tin Pot Czar on a horse pic when I need it? LOL.


37 posted on 01/03/2017 3:28:28 PM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I agree with this article.


38 posted on 01/03/2017 3:36:47 PM PST by samtheman (I REALLY hope Trump reads FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson