Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dsc

Sadly, SCOTUS wouldn’t agree; they sure didn’t when W tried to undo Clinton’s clean coal/NATIONAL MONUMENT grab.


33 posted on 12/28/2016 10:39:53 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

Hopefully SCOTUS is about to be restocked soon. Many on those seats are way past their best-used-by dates.


67 posted on 12/29/2016 7:16:55 AM PST by 9422WMR (President Trump, I like the sound of that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

“Sadly, SCOTUS wouldn’t agree”

They don’t have to. Our government is designed so that any two branches can rein in the third.

The Supreme Court seems to think that “court of last resort” means they have the final say over everyone.


69 posted on 12/29/2016 7:44:24 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson