Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BulletBobCo

this story has been going around the airline/aviation community for at least 20 years. it’s probably BS. Military aircraft like this fly above class A airspace so civilian Air Traffic Controllers have no responsibility over them. In addition, performance capabilities are classified info.


5 posted on 12/28/2016 8:30:09 PM PST by airplaneguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: airplaneguy

I believe it’s an excerpt from a book called Sled Driver. As such, you have to wonder if it ever happened at all, or if it was there just to sell books


14 posted on 12/28/2016 8:40:03 PM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: airplaneguy

A friend in the Air Force said that an F-16 pilot was teasing a low flying SR-71 in Korea; calling him an unmaneuverable cow that deserved a sidewinder up the tail-pipe. The SR-71 pilots just said “Try it!” and disappeared in a sonic boom before the F-16 pilot could blink.

Probably didn’t happen but still a good story


15 posted on 12/28/2016 8:40:41 PM PST by Fai Mao (PIAPS for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: airplaneguy
this story has been going around the airline/aviation community for at least 20 years.

More like 45 years.

it’s probably BS.

It is the word of the actual pilot and copilot of the SR-71. You would have to believe they both lied, and authorized putting it into a book based on their experience, to accept it as BS.

Military aircraft like this fly above class A airspace so civilian Air Traffic Controllers have no responsibility over them.

Correct. The tower was only reporting the groundspeed as measured on their radar equipment in response to a REQUEST FROM the SR-71 crew.

In addition, performance capabilities are classified info.

Yes, but there are things that you cannot hide. Like altitude and groundspeed measured by civilian radar. The pilots responding with their 'more accurate' speed revealed nothing that was not already known. That was proven by the tower response that he knew the SR-71's 'equipment' was more accurate. Most of that was due to the fact that not all airports had the most advanced radar equipment recently installed (because that is an impractical and almost impossible thing to do/expect). It gave away information that could only prove that the tower's equipment gave a different speed than the SR-71's, and any idiot could figure out that the SR-71 had more accurate equipment.

46 posted on 12/28/2016 9:29:58 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: airplaneguy

Who cares? It’s a story, a rather good one at that......’MERICA!!!!


61 posted on 12/28/2016 10:09:44 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: airplaneguy
this story has been going around the airline/aviation community for at least 20 years. it’s probably BS. Military aircraft like this fly above class A airspace so civilian Air Traffic Controllers have no responsibility over them. In addition, performance capabilities are classified info.

I've worked around fighter pilots for 35 years and they have a motto, "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."

111 posted on 12/29/2016 6:07:29 AM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: airplaneguy

“The first liar doesn’t stand a chance”


113 posted on 12/29/2016 6:20:57 AM PST by GOYAKLA ( "Suck it up Buttercup"; Pick-up the pace, I'm eighty-one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson