Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pinkbell
As usual, I see a lot of people in here blaming the messenger, whether it be "The Hill" or Newt Gingrich, instead of rebutting or explaining the message.

Those that do explain the message say that Trump still wants to drain the swamp, he just doesn't want to use that term anymore. If he still intends to do it (drain the swamp), what benefit is there in not using the phrase?

Truth is, Trump has backed off a lot of the rhetoric he used to get elected.

I'll be happy if it turns out that he wasn't just playing to the crowd ("playing the crowd" is more like it), but I'm not going to hold my breath.

Still much better than Hillary, for the SCOTUS implications alone.

59 posted on 12/21/2016 12:47:20 PM PST by Washi (Google "the long march through the institutions" to see how the left is waging their revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Washi

I see what your point is. The phrase was a success, and if the actions are going to match the phrase, why not use it? Depending on the coverage this gets, Trump can easily issue a Tweet or comment to respond.

I will say I don’t think anyone should blindly follow any politician. There should be a degree of skepticism or willingness to criticize if necessary. I will wait to see what Trump in office, though, before I say he isn’t adhering to what he promised. At this point, I will trust him.


63 posted on 12/21/2016 12:59:21 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson