Maybe, but you need to have ironclad language, such as we have in Michigan, where a "faithless" vote is immediately disqualified and replaced via installing an elector who honors the November election results.
An ounce of prevention >>> pound of cure
Of course, Michigan has its own need for corrective legislation, such as making sure any candidate requesting a recount must pay for it in full in advance, as well as making sure that said candidate has a chance to actually win in any recount.
:: there needs to be a law passed in TX that faithless electors are guilty of a FELONY ::
I might not go as far as that [felony] but each elector should be reminded that they ^must^ cast their vote according to their “constituency-vote”; AKA: vox populi.
If we have Electors that ignore their voters, do we not have sedition? The votes of November have been cast, ne c’est pas?
I would rather see the localities represented by the Elector to file charges of Constitutional sedition.
Will Soros pay for a losing cause to protect his minions?