Rogue One: Are Chirrut and Baze Star Wars's first same-sex couple? (Well THAT didn't take long)

‘Rogue One’ is unlike any other ‘Star Wars’ film that’s come before for many reasons, but one of the most exciting is the diversity of its cast. From its female lead, to its international roster of actors from all around the world, it’s clear the franchise has come leaps and bounds from the original trilogy with its sole non-white character – Billy Dee Williams’ Lando Calrissian.

Beyond the characters’ ethnic backgrounds though, same-sex couples are still apparently absent from the ‘Star Wars’ movie universe… or are they? Could ‘Rogue One’ also feature the franchise’s first same-sex screen couple, too?

I doubt Disney’s going to pull THAT off. For starters, they’d have to consider the fact that ultimately, families are paying to see their movies. While they can get away with claiming that, technically, Gay Days is not officially affiliated with Disney, the same can’t be said about their big screen features which are STILL ultimately geared toward families. Heck, when that pastor accused Disney of promoting homosexuality in Frozen, they nearly got into DEEP trouble as a result. Even they wouldn’t be that stupid.

They want to “gay” everything...even when it’s not.

I had this discussion with a friend a while back, that one of the consequences of the gaying up of the West is that deep friendships between men are either discouraged or mocked. Any time two guys in a movie or a TV show have a close friendship, it is referred to as a "bromance" which by its very name implies sexuality. I don't know if this effort is deliberate or just one of the many negative consequences of feminism and cultural marxism in general, but either way it deprives men and society of one of the most crucial elements of life. Tight bonds among men are what make the world go 'round. They are what makes any organization or society function and remain intact (which is probably why it is being derided). These days especially, women can walk out on a whim and take all of your wealth and family, but a good friend is forever.

It is almost as if the natural tendency for men to form these bonds is being deliberately perverted. Young men who crave such bonds are told now that they must be gay, and so what would have been a constructive bond becomes destructive, and other men might shy away from developing such bonds to avoid the stigma of "bromance". It truly is an insidious trend, and should be resisted at all costs. You'll notice that men are not allowed to gather these days. Men's clubs are sued to allow women, any that resist are called "sexist, misogynist," etc. If the group persists, like the Boy Scouts, an effort is then made to pervert the organization through homosexuality. It is precisely to keep men from forming social bonds and thereby becoming stronger, more able to resist the programming and demoralization that the Left spews out.

When the time comes truly to fight these people, we'll need trust and cooperation between men to do it. That is what the Left is afraid of.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.