Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu

Maybe I don’t understand the definition of transitional species.

What are they? Please give the answer concisely, explicitly and visibly in your post without any links.


209 posted on 12/21/2016 9:39:55 AM PST by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

Depends on who you ask I suppose. On the creationist side it’s a convenient goal post that can always be shifted, for them every time we find a species that goes in between 2 other species that means we suddenly need to find 2 more transition species (one to get from the first one to the new find, and one to get from the new find to the second). They like that since it’s an unending source of “but”, if we found those other species they’d demand even MORE transition species. An unsatisfiable question is fun for people who are afraid of being wrong, it’s not really good logic, but they’re not into logic.

For people who actually get the science a transition species is anything that goes between two others. So with H. antecessor being between H. erectus and H. heidelbergensis that makes H. antecessor a transition. And of course H. heidelbergensis is also a transition because he gets us to H. rhodesiensis, who is also a transition since he’s part of that very last step to US homo sapiens. And hopefully we’re a transition to something else, because the only things that don’t get to be transition species are dead ends. And that would kind of suck.


210 posted on 12/21/2016 9:56:37 AM PST by discostu (Alright you primative screwheads, listen up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson