Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Solson

Apparently, the victim said some sex was consensual, some not. In any case, if the victim was impaired, consent is still an issue. And if she didn’t consent to the taping, or did while impaired, also an issue. And while the criminal case is toast, these degenerates deserve everything the college throws at them.


55 posted on 12/16/2016 3:57:39 AM PST by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla
While I agree these idiots are thugs who deserve everything the LAW can throw against them, this is a university that refuses to release the color of suspects, and has college "codes of ethics" which can expel someone for offending another student. The entire University, especially the sport department, is a complete cluster.

Police could have pressed charges if they wanted to do so. They chose not to do that. That was the mistake here.

64 posted on 12/16/2016 6:27:37 AM PST by Solson (Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: mewzilla

If both parties were impaired, why is the guy to blame? If a woman drives drunk does that not count either?


76 posted on 12/16/2016 2:57:14 PM PST by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson