It's actually an easy choice. The better of these two alternatives is currently winning the war in Syria.
Globalists/Progressives are sad about that, but I am not.
One side is driven by the desire for personal power while the other side is driven by a sick ideology. Between the two, lamentable though it is, commend me to the former.
Same here A small country’s secular government is less of a threat to the world than islam.
LET ME REPEAT THAT!
“Secular strongman
or
Fundamentalist Jihadis
It’s actually an easy choice. The better of these two alternatives is currently winning the war in Syria.
Globalists/Progressives are sad about that, but I am not.
5 posted on 12/15/2016, 8:06:10 AM by ClearCase_guy
ME NEITHER.
We were better off and WOULD BE NOW if all the middle east strongmen were still in power.
Is Israel safer today?
Has all of our meddling and attempts of “nation building” (REGION building) created “stability” in the middle east?
Has Obama’s embrace of middle east muslims borne any fruit?
Perhaps “Durian”
(The persistence of its odor, which may linger for several days, has led to the fruit’s banishment from certain hotels and public transportation in Southeast Asia.)