Peshaw! An un-credible source. Not nearly as credible an an un-named source for the cia’s initial conclusion to rooskie tampering/hacking. /s
My opinion only.
Then again, the Democrats probably won't believe it... at least, publicly. Hey, maybe we need another wikileaks of high ranking Democrats discussing how they plan to blame the Russians for Hillary's loss. Lots of nugget in that email exchange, I bet.
“They”
Huma? She got screwed over the most and hillary mail was on weiner’s laptop
Hillary already knew. See Seth Rich murder which will remain unsolved.
ML/NJ
If he knew anything about techie stuff I would say Bill Clinton (believe it or not) to be the leaker. There are a lot of reasons for him being the one. Perhaps he had someone do it for him....
And one of the DNC leakers already got whacked about 2 months ago walking on the street.
Why were we not investigating HIllary and Obama’s ineligibility?
Think about it. We were called birthers but never asked the Electors to rebuke Obama!!!
Who is racist, eh?
Murray called it Kafkaesque:
“.....It is far more likely he was simply amused by the whole sordid affair.
Murray took aim at the hapless establishment media for blatantly spreading the Russian lie calling them,
“Kafkaesque.””
Maybe Bill just really really really did not want to go down in the History books as the 1st Husband.
Remember all those tablets and Blackberries HRC lost, according to the FBI?
She’s surrounded by staff, secret service, and sycophants 24/7. How on earth would she misplace a tablet?
She wouldn’t...her staff probably took them.
yea and where the hell is assange now?
could this whole thing be a false flag to smoke out the real leaker?
Well maybe, just maybe, there really is an honest defector from the Clinton Mafia... Someone who loves their country, honest dealings, truth and God...
Or, perhaps it was just a jilted Hillary lover... or someone who was further to the ideological left and who ended up favoring Sanders...
Regardless ... an insider leak was the most plausible source all along... Just doesn’t fit the latest Clintonista narrative.
The “The Russians did it!” bunch is really hanging their hat on guccifer 2.0...they point to this one hacker as “the Russians” ignoring the fact that guccifer 2.0 did not provide the vast majority of the released emails
Wikileaks, Anonymous, and several other hackers provided material
guccifer 2.0 was only a small part yet that’s the only one that they can pointing to as possibly being “the Russians”
So heads up
The thing is they may find there was some Russian involvement via guccifer 2.0 ..but he was a very small part
So they will amplified guccifer 2.0 into being THE ONE HACKER... which he(or she) was not......
Wikileaks was the main leader of this and Wikileaks state flatly it came from an inside source
As much as I want the Assange assertion to be believed, I’m failing to see how anyone is all of a sudden going to say “Oh... Julian says that Russia is not involved. OK, that’s solves it all folks!”