Posted on 12/13/2016 10:09:12 AM PST by Enlightened1
Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement. His close associate, former British Ambassador (Uzbekistan) Craig Murray, has said the same. It was an inside job. Not Russian hackers.
These are the only two people in the world who know the source. Only two people who have actually met the source. Both deny Russian involvement. Both say it was a Clinton insider. After new calls from the democrats to investigate the leaks, a stunned Murray came forward again to set the record straight.
He said,
“There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption.”
“I know who leaked them.”
“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian.”
“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”
CLOSE CLINTON CONFIDANT HATES HER MORE THAN PUTIN
The difference is that someone inside the DNC, a very close Clinton confidant, hates her more than Putin. Why else release evidence of her corruption and torpedo her coronation? Only someone close could have done this. And only someone close would have done this.
Because hatred that deep only comes from close association. It is impossible to have that much long-distance hate for someone you have never met.
Putin has no way of really knowing whether Trump or Clinton will be better for him either. He may have an idea, but to execute what he is accused of would be extremely hard, if not impossible. To try it, To risk WW3 on a coin flip seems absurd.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...
This was from someone who had a strong personal dislike of someone at the DNC and Clinton insiders.
Also, the emails from Hillary's private server were never released. That means that either the Russians never had them, or were planning on using them as blackmail material once she was elected. By the way, I believe a Hillary victory would have served the Russian cause more than a Trump victory. Another reason this hacking accusation is so ridiculous.
So, what woman was scorned to produce such action?
Who could she be? Ia there bad blood between Huma and Cheryl?
Why would Cheryl do such a thing? She’s black and has such a wonderful advantage that receiving less perks than Huma shouldn’t really be that kind of problem.
Inside job = (Job)ama.
of course they leaked it with full intention to blame russians if she lost- Woopsie- she got caught- Again!
It looks like they may be using this book as a template for this story
https://www.amazon.com/Plot-Hack-America-Cyberspies-WikiLeaks/dp/1510723323
The Plot to Hack America: How Putin’s Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election Paperback – October 10, 2016
by Malcolm Nance (Author)
Here is Craig Murray’s blog from Dec 11: https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/
I don’t know anything about Craig Murray, a former ambassador. He speaks as if he has some connection with Assange.
If I had to take a guess, it would be husband Bill who leaked da leak. It’s about the only thing he can leak these days.
Still zero proof the leaks did anything to alter the election.
No one has explained how the,leaks changed the voting outcome.
It really only would matter if it were false information.
No one contends what was leaked, is false.
So basically what it becomes is tjis: they are saying that the truth coming out about a candidate by a leaker source, the truth about a candidate coming out, stole an election.
Honestly did you need the leaks to convince you to not vote for Hillary? Did anyone, really? Or did it just confirm to people why they weren’t ever going to vote for her? The person who had the highest negatives in every demographic, of a presidential candidate dems put up, ever?
This person is very bitter. I’m embarrassed for the news media to stand before us and try to sell this false construct, this Russian “hack”. If they knew how they looked to regular folks...
Agreed.
I fear that Assange is either dead or being held against his will. He hasn’t been heard from in some time and there are indications that he was removed from the Embassy of Ecuador prior to the election. The ‘dead man switch’ hasn’t been triggered but it’s possible the wikileaks organization has been compromised to the point where it can’t be triggered. The bogus claim that ‘The Russians’ were behind the leaks couldn’t be put forward if Assange were available to refute it. I think they neutralized him and perhaps tortured him to break the organization. I know this falls into the category of ‘conspiracy theories’ but I’m troubled by Julian’s lack of appearances.
Bingo!
Ales Jones said he was dead but I did not read the article. It would be good to have more sources.
I hope Trump gives Assange the Metal of Freedom. He sure has earned it.
Yes, indeed.
I discovered that the TRUTH is the best AND the easiest because it doesn't change. NO ONE can poke holes in it.
I never was a good liar either. My face expressed every thought in my head. Needless to say, no poker for me.
My husband was hairy. And I was the "guerilla" of his dreams. Pardon the pun.
However, he CAN look at himself in the mirror and KNOW that what he did was the RIGHT thing. That does count, especially with our good Lord.
I don’t think the leaker will ever want to come forward. He would not have a good life expectancy.
Believe that the Russians hacked the DNC and you’ll believe that the dog ate my homework.
Consider the abuse she has heaped on her Secret Service detail over the years. Not a good idea, with people who have access to every intimate detail of your life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.