Hmmmm. NOW who's the nazis? As for sen black and his thinking not a single rep will vote for the bill. Maybe an actual conservative won't vote for it but there's rinos galore out there.
1 posted on
12/08/2016 6:22:35 AM PST by
rktman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: rktman
Like a wedding registry? I’d like a Kimber.
2 posted on
12/08/2016 6:23:15 AM PST by
Cboldt
To: rktman
I think we should have a Democrat registry.
3 posted on
12/08/2016 6:23:54 AM PST by
Renegade
To: rktman
“A recent survey found that one out of three liberals is just as stupid as the other two.”
4 posted on
12/08/2016 6:24:23 AM PST by
Noumenon
(Proud Irredeemable Deplorable, heavily armed Infidel. Islam delenda est.)
To: rktman
Fine, Babs. Start your gun registering in the hoods.
7 posted on
12/08/2016 6:24:40 AM PST by
LouieFisk
To: rktman
8 posted on
12/08/2016 6:25:06 AM PST by
onedoug
To: rktman
I have a better idea. How about a libtard registry?
9 posted on
12/08/2016 6:26:20 AM PST by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: rktman
because she believes arming police with a database of gun records would provide them with an additional tool to fight crime. Yep, I'm sure all the gangbangers in Richmond and the DC suburbs are going to be rushing down to the police station to register their "piece" with the authorities.
10 posted on
12/08/2016 6:27:37 AM PST by
apillar
To: rktman
voluntary registration should be allowed...
along with fingerprints, dna samples, and bank statements.
because, nothing ever bad happens when the government is involved.
11 posted on
12/08/2016 6:28:18 AM PST by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: rktman
This fool was supposed to present the registry idea with a Hillary win not Trump.
To: rktman
I have a feeling that this approach won’t work, but how far away is it before the gov’t requires a “bullet footprint” for every gun sold tied to its serial number and the owner of that gun.
13 posted on
12/08/2016 6:30:46 AM PST by
econjack
To: rktman
We should have an anti-American registry!
15 posted on
12/08/2016 6:33:22 AM PST by
CodeToad
(If it weren't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstoppable!)
To: rktman
Never mind that gun registrations DO NOT help solve crimes and would cost millions of dollars.
The ONLY reason for a gun registration is so the government has a list of owners when they decide to confiscate them.
17 posted on
12/08/2016 6:33:42 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
To: rktman
“She just wants to know what youre packing.”
Most of us don’t really care what she wants. She can be turned out at the next election.
18 posted on
12/08/2016 6:34:00 AM PST by
odawg
To: rktman
This is going nowhere. Probably another fundraising gimmick.
19 posted on
12/08/2016 6:34:21 AM PST by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
To: rktman
I think we ought to lobotomize Democrats.
20 posted on
12/08/2016 6:34:36 AM PST by
Arm_Bears
(Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
To: rktman
We should have a liberal registry. And we should further stipulate that each name on the registry must be alive, and can only vote once.
22 posted on
12/08/2016 6:36:20 AM PST by
meyer
(There is no political solution to this troubling evolution...)
To: rktman
because she believes arming police with a database of gun records would provide them with an additional tool to fight crimeYeah, because criminals will be all too willing to register their guns.
24 posted on
12/08/2016 6:37:23 AM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: rktman
I think communist politicians need to stop screwing around with the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment doesn’t say anything about “gun registries”.
25 posted on
12/08/2016 6:39:08 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(As long as tyranny exists, the Constitution and Bill of Right will never be "outdated" or "obsolete")
To: rktman
Any kind of firearms registry is a terrible idea, and just as much of an impingement on constitutional rights as, for example, a registry of people who hold certain religious beliefs, or who have a particular sexual preference.
But if any such registry were to come into existence, the law should require that all firearms be on the registry, along with the home addresses and identity of everyone who has a firearm. Including all the government employees who have access to or carry a firearm during the course of their official duties. And that data should be readily available to the public, because whatever reason the government has to know who owns what firearm also applies to the public.
To: rktman
How about a Muslim registry?
27 posted on
12/08/2016 6:40:23 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(As long as tyranny exists, the Constitution and Bill of Right will never be "outdated" or "obsolete")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson