PizzaGate Is 100% Real, Why Is Media Lying? [Obama voter & Huffington Post writer - profanity]

YouTube [eight minute video] ^ | December 6, 2016 | David Seaman

[grundle]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGVSA2Jjelo

[Robert DeLong]

Absolutely, no one is doubting that at all. That is not what this discussion is about though.

[Robert DeLong]

Don’t misunderstand, I am not discounting it either. I have an open mind, just provide proof. They have provided circumstantial evidence, but especially in this case, it is not enough.

[Boogieman]

“It’s sloppy/inaccurate/dishonest attribution...”

So it is false. The writer is making stuff up and putting in his stories. If you don’t like the word “hoax”, fine, but the source for this story is an anonymous website that is known for putting out false information, which you have just admitted.

“For all we know, somebody from wiki leaks (or pretending to be from wiki leaks) did re”leak” the documents 5 months after Judicial watch got them by court order.”

So wikileaks is leaking things to an anonymous liar with a website nobody ever heard of before he happened to put out a story that pizzagate people picked up with and spread all over the internet? Yeah, right.....

“And the SUBSTANCE of the “leak”: 100% TRUE, was it not?”

So the “fake but accurate” defense? Dan Rather, is that you?

I notice you won’t even try to defend the other 100% fake story he posted. Don’t think nobody notices the lengths you go to defend this, your only source for what you really want to believe, while at the same time completely ignoring the fake stories he put out that you simply can’t defend.

[HLPhat]

What part of “by any means necessary” did you not comprehend, Boogietard?  The gloves are off.

Hillary Clinton, the murderess of Benghazi, will not been getting her carpet cleaned in the White Hut.   If reinjecting the substance of Judicial Watch's May 18 discovery into the electoral process by sensationalizing it with the flow of "Wiki Leaks" that was goining on in October/November - then I say, GOOD, and thanks to whoever was clever enough to do it and make those FACTS temporarily relevant in the minds of the desensitized sheeple herd again.

Mission Accomplished.

Now, we move on to the conservative salvage operation for the Republic - and that includes making it clear that the proliferation of this sort of nature-abominating amoral "culture" ala the subversive application of state-established power...

 

...is no longer bidness as usual. 

MAGA

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

[magglepuss]

thanks for post 75. This is really well done.

[Mr. K]

You should go do some research on the wikileaks emails about it.

It sounds like there is something there. If it is even SUSPECTED they should investigate fully. For the children.

[Boogieman]

Seems like you just want to change the subject as you have studiously avoided acknowledging the 100% false “Comey is raiding Hillary” story they put out.

Just face it, you were spreading a fake story from an anonymous liar, and it happened because you don’t even bother to track down the sources of the stuff you are promoting to other people as “truth”.

[HLPhat]

>>They took information from Judicial Watch, without attribution, attributed it to a fake source

And reinjected the FACTS Judicial Watch discovered back in May into the 5 minute attention span of the sheeple.

Frankly, I'm a little less concerned about who/how the artillery fire was directed - than I am thankful that it was right on target, when required.

Are you butthurt because Hillary won't be allowed to instigate WWIII?

Boohoo for you.

MAGA.

[HLPhat]

>>Just face it, you were spreading a fake story from an anonymous liar,

FU. I’ll stand with Eric Prince.

[Boogieman]

It’s hilarious that you are going to such lengths to defend a lying clickbait site that you didn’t even know was the source for the story you’ve been promoting until I pointed it out to you.

Don’t you think it’s pretty irresponsible that you are promoting stuff when you don’t even know where it comes from? The skeptics of this pizzagate story are more well-informed about it than you!

[HLPhat]

>>and it happened because you don’t even bother to track down the sources

Might want to check your FACTS there BoogieTARD.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3495383/posts?page=181#181

Meanwhile, you sound more and more like the butt hurt media that was sooo excited about Hillary and her “consolidation of power”.

You sure you’re on the right forum - maybe you’d be better consoled with the rest of the poodle brigade licking their LGBTQXYZwhatevers over on DU?

[HLPhat]

>>The skeptics of this pizzagate story are more well-informed about it than you!

FU. I’ll stand with Eric Prince.

[Boogieman]

Hahaha, you’re really upset, aren’t you?

[MHGinTN]

And that does appear to be the sole reason for your lurking at FR, to irritate Freepers.

[Boogieman]

If my pointing out the truth is an irritant to them, that’s not my fault. I do admit I feel some slight amusement when people who are spreading false information are reducing to repeatedly yelling “FU” “FU” instead of just admitting they made a mistake and trying to avoid it in the future.

It’s understandable when you are dealing with people who form opinions based on emotion though.

[HLPhat]

>>Hahaha, you’re really upset, aren’t you?

Not as upset as the "culture" of moral reprobates who are disappointed that...

 

...might not be delivering whatever to the White Hut for the next 8 years. 

Boohoo for you!

MAGA

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

[Yaelle]

I didn’t take the McMartin case seriously. When I heard about it, the children’s claims had been debunked. Then in grad school the professor brought in a person to speak for our class who claimed to be a victim and what she told us was so horrific and shocking it blew my mind, and she was very believable. She nearly destroyed herself afterwards and had come such a long way toward normalcy and she wasn’t on a speaking tour, she just wanted to speak to small classrooms like ours as part of her therapy. She may have been a patient of our professor but he was careful not to say it.

Nevertheless, after hearing her, this precious woman and what she had been through, my best friend at the time and I walked out into the bright sunlight and shook it all off. Must have been mad enough up, crazy stories.

Now, what I have learned about pedophiles when they get together has made me rethink about this woman back then. And there were apparently some kinds of tunnels under that address. You can google it. It’s right where I was driving around for years trying to find parking for Pacific school, where my son went. We used that urgent care facility as well.

And if you understand the mind control crap they do to some of these unlucky kids to screw with the child’s own memory abilities, you know that the fanciful stuff and the abuse stuff can be entwined to make the child unfit to testify. Of course, since then, they seem to have gone beyond risking a child’s memory to often making the child victims just disappear. And finding them where the parents if there are any won’t know how to protest.

[HLPhat]

>>spreading false information

Which part of this is false information?

 

 

Meanwhile, You, Hillary, and the "FACT checking" jackwagon the Clintoon Alphafem poodle herd tried to ride in on can go pound sand -- I'll stand with Eric Prince and the rest of the folks who are happy to be WINNING this round of the culture war.

[Strac6]

Did u really post that?

[HLPhat]

>>It’s understandable when you are dealing with people who form opinions based on emotion though.

Stick that gas light in the wherever you’re head is and turn the valve on.

Should moral reprobates whose self-worshiping behavior mirrors that of the “culture” described Romans Chapter 1 have undisputed access to the White Hut -

Yes or No?