This recount will certainly amount to nothing. But what about next time? An immediate GOP counter-demand for a New Hampshire recount would have at least given the Democrats something to think about, even if that demand is for show only.
How about Nevada and New Mexico?
The riots didn’t work, the ‘stealing of EV’s’ are not working, so this is their last try to convince the American Voters that Trump will not make it...
Do you see Trump not filling his cabinet? Have you heard or read where the Election Committee has told him to stop? Has this been presented into the Supreme Court: Bush VS Gore....
Until any of that happens, this is the media, talking heads and pundits trying to beat us down...I’m not doing that...
God has His hands on Trump...has had since day one...no one other than God could have protected Trump from what they have thrown at him since day one...
Isn't that where anyone would target a recount? That is likely why no one is contesting Kalifornia too.
It is getting pretty obvious that the intent isn't the recount results, it's all about stein and her lawyers and $7.5M.
Because nobody would donate a penny for a recount effort in a state that was won by the losing candidate. Trump supporters would be smart enough not to waste their money on that.
Hopefully by the next election we will have real voter verification laws in place.One CITIZEN,one vote.Oh,and only the living get a ballot.
Odd that she is only targeting states where Trump won by razor-thin margins. Why not also recount New Hampshire (Hillary by 0.4%)?
********************
What is the purpose of her recounts? Was it to reduce Trump’s total and maybe put
Hillary in? If so why would she want to count states Hillary won?
I think they ought to use these recounts to show fraud in the Democrat counties (Like Detroit where there was irregularities). Judges have pointed out there is no evidence of voter fraud in ruling against laws making voting requirements stricter. We need to use these recounts as a basis for eliminating fraud.
By not counting in all 50 states would that not go against the “one person - one vote” Law?
Want to see heads explode? Let do what they are doing, let’s force a recount in New Hampshire. Imagine if Trump ended up beating hILLery in a recount there.
These recounts are nothing more than attempts to deny Trump these states EV’s being counted at the Fed deadline and without presenting any evidence of election fraud or significant harm to the Green Party. He should challenge the votes of California, Nevada and Colorado based on the strong possibility that illegals voted in these states as well as Virginia based on McCauliffe’s legally dubious pardoning of felons. This would deny Clinton more EV’s than Trump stands to lose in the rust belt.
Ain't gonna be any such states; likely a clean sweep by Trump (or Pence).
Trump and team recognize the mire of Stein for what it is and will not stoop when they already know she will fail.
What I would rather see is a demand to document the validity of votes, i.e., how many illegals voted, how many unregistered voters, how many votes from people registered in multiple states or multiple precincts, etc. Then build the case to - once and for all - clean up voter registration rolls and implement and enforce voter ID requirements.
I’d demanded recounts in NH, NV, NM.
Blow it wide open and ask for every state that Clinton won.
Her explanation is that it's too late to contest those results. Of course, that hasn't stopped her from contesting Pennsylvania's results.