yes and someone else said that the cancelling of the state case will effect the federal suit because they have failed on remedy at the state level. hope that is true.
She already could not meet the evidentiary standard of presenting evidence for a prima facie case of election fraud; now she has to deal with a whole 'nother quantum level of difficulty.
Under the US Constitution, Pennsylvania is given sole authority for conducting its elections. In order to prevail in Federal Court, she would need to establish that something in PA's election or recount laws violates a part of the US Constitution. That she will never be able to do.
In effect, she has gone from needing to meet an entirely practical, and relatively low, evidentiary standard, to proving a due process violation. She could not establish one as a matter of plain fact, which would have been a prerequisite to meeting the other as a matter of law.