Posted on 12/01/2016 11:29:21 AM PST by Kaslin
President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly considering seriously at least two men for the critical position of secretary of state. One, former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, has divided the Trump team between those who think it is a good idea and those who think Romney's severe criticism of Trump during the campaign disqualifies him.
The other is retired general and former CIA Director David Petraeus. A major problem for Petraeus is his mishandling of classified documents, which he reportedly leaked to his biographer-mistress, Paula Broadwell. After Trump hammered Hillary Clinton for her "extremely careless" handling of classified material when she was secretary of state, it would be hypocritical of Trump to name Petraeus.
Though also in the running, former New York mayor, Rudy Giuliani is thought to be running a distant third, if the number of visits in and out of Trump Tower are any indication.
So, of the top two contenders, who? How about someone with experience as a diplomat, including within the State Department and as a former U.N. ambassador?
John Bolton, now a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a regular commentator on cable news, does not engage in wishful thinking, or project American morals on those who don't share them in the vain hope they might be contagious. Here is Bolton on the threat of radical Islamic terrorism: "When you have a regime that would be happier in the afterlife than in this life, this is not a regime that is subject to classic theories of deterrence."
n his book "Surrendering is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations," Bolton is unrelenting in his criticism of the toothless UN and of many U.S. policies that have not produced results in America's best interests -- precisely the attitude of President-elect Trump, who wants to look out for America and its interests first. In this pursuit he is not unlike one of his predecessors, Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, who said, "What takes place in the Security Council more closely resembles a mugging than either a political debate or an effort at problem-solving." It is a mugging, and too often it is the United States and Israel who get mugged.
Here's another Bolton quote: "Negotiation is not a policy. It's a technique. It's something you use when it's to your advantage, and something that you don't use when it's not to your advantage." That is the opposite of wishful thinking.
In a July 2015 column for the Dallas Morning News, Bolton wrote that it is a fiction to believe Iran won't violate terms of the nuclear weapons deal it made with the Obama administration. He argues that "snapback" sanctions won't work because sanctions failed before. He thinks the only option for keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of the ayatollahs is Israel.
"However, Iran may well retaliate," Bolton acknowledges. "At that point, Washington must be ready to immediately resupply Israel for losses incurred by its armed forces in the initial attack, so that Israel will still be able to effectively counter Tehran's proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah, which will be its vehicles for retaliation. The United States must also provide muscular political support, explaining that Israel legitimately exercised its inherent right of self-defense. Whatever Obama's view, public and congressional support for Israel will be overwhelming."
Who is to blame for this situation? Bolton writes: "American weakness has brought us to this difficult moment. While we obsessed about its economic discomfort, Iran wore its duress with pride. It was never an even match. We now have to rely on a tiny ally to do the job for us. But unless we are ready to accept a nuclear Iran (and, in relatively short order, several other nuclear Middle Eastern states), get ready. The easy ways out disappeared long ago."
This is sober reality and precisely the worldview that is needed at the Department of State.
Bolton. Or maybe Giuliani. We need a sec of Snake who will Drain the Swamp at the Snake Department. Get all Nazis, islamonazis, iskamophiles, “Arabians,” and other enemy agents or useful idiots OUT OF OUR GOVERNMENT. ASAP!
Also not ‘reported” or “alleged” that Petraeus is teaming up with the lying hypocrite leftist spaceman Mark Kelly to strip me of my gun rights. #nopetraeus
I guess you’re right. It says right there in the article his policy to keep Iran from getting nukes would be to have Israel attack them and then us come in behind. I don’t think that’s the way we’re going to do things anymore. As far as I’m concerned, the nuclear armed Iran is a fact on the ground or fait accompli. Now the problem is how to keep them from nuking anybody, and seeing if we can keep the KSA and the UAE from following suit.
"However, Iran may well retaliate," Bolton acknowledges. "At that point, Washington must be ready to immediately resupply Israel for losses incurred by its armed forces in the initial attack, so that Israel will still be able to effectively counter Tehran's proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah, which will be its vehicles for retaliation. The United States must also provide muscular political support, explaining that Israel legitimately exercised its inherent right of self-defense. Whatever Obama's view, public and congressional support for Israel will be overwhelming."
Who is to blame for this situation? Bolton writes: "American weakness has brought us to this difficult moment. While we obsessed about its economic discomfort, Iran wore its duress with pride. It was never an even match. We now have to rely on a tiny ally to do the job for us. But unless we are ready to accept a nuclear Iran (and, in relatively short order, several other nuclear Middle Eastern states), get ready. The easy ways out disappeared long ago."
This is sober reality and precisely the worldview that is needed at the Department of State.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ The kind of sober adult talk that this country has been sorely missing. A "peace through strength" kinda guy. Gets my vote.
If not Bolton, then Condoleeza Rice. Never Romney and find another job for Rudy
Bolton is anti UN, anti international law, anti ICC and pro US sovereignty. He would do an excellent job draining the DOS swamp.
I agree with that.
“As far as I’m concerned, the nuclear armed Iran is a fact on the ground or fait accompli.”
F that. I don’t care if we have to mount a Normandy-scale invasion, those pigdog murder-muzzies must not be allowed to have nuclear weapons.
Jedem Menschen recht getan ist eine Kunst die niemand kann
translated into English it means:
Everyone done right is an art that no one can (do)
In other words It does not matter who he chooses, there will be some who will complain about his choice.
Uh -- whut?
He's been living in that swamp for more than three decades.
“Bolton is a neocon(gag). Neocons have their own agenda.....not the best interests of Americans. Bolton is useless to Donald’s MAGA agenda.”
Really? The forces of evil lost their minds when Bush nominated him for UN ambassador. That’s usually a pretty good recommendation.
I’m not a neocon, but I do think people need to know that if they make themselves too obnoxious, we will kill them.
Excellent point....Bolton is too establishment......we demand change.
Can you name a Bush nominee who didn't cause the "forces of evil" to lose their minds?
...and none other than Michael Bloomberg is also on their team, along with GEN (Ret.) Stanley McChrystal, GEN (ret.) Michael Hayden and ADM (Ret.) Thad Allen. One wonders just WHAT constitution they swore an oath “...to protect and defend against all enemies foreign and domestic.”
“Petraeus has joined forces with gun-control Leftists, including former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Astronaut-turned-activist Michael Kelly, and launched yet another gun control advocacy organization.” Source: http://www.freedom.news/2016-06-22-did-gen-petraeus-betray-us-over-the-issue-of-gun-control.html
The subsequent rebuttal of Petraeus supporters can be expected:
“But the Secretary of State is just the President’s chief foreign policy advisor. He can’t do anything to strengthen gun control!”
Wrong.
In 2013, Secretary of State John Kerry signed an anti-gun treaty at the United Nations, without authorization from the Senate, that could have left US citizens subject to strict gun control under the auspices of the UN. Fortunately, the treaty had been voted down before it was signed, making it effectively dead on arrival. However, that did not stop the Obama administration from pushing for its ratification just two months ago.
Source: http://fmshooter.com/gen-petraeus-must-not-secretary-state/
What is that supposed to mean?
This is just an opinion by Bob Barr and he has no proof on this.
I think Bolton would be up to speed much faster than any of the other candidates and likely more attuned to whatever the new POTUS lays out to be accomplished strategically. GO FOR BOLTON!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.