Yeah, it really ain't "new" news but hopefully PE Trump knows about his "bromance" with margabby kelly-giffords. NO WAY should he be place in a position once again to put the country at risk. We already know he can be compromised with a whiff of female pheromones. NO on betray-us. Did he forget "This is my rifle, this is my gun. One is for fighting, one is for fun." Thanks for your service, General, in any case. Now, you're dismissed.
1 posted on
11/30/2016 5:22:01 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
Dick Cheney should invite this guy on a hunting trip...
2 posted on
11/30/2016 5:23:21 AM PST by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: rktman
No gun-control proponents.
Which also means no Romney.
3 posted on
11/30/2016 5:26:46 AM PST by
Westbrook
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
To: rktman
Petraeus is NOT pushing gun control. He is part of a group which wants to reduce gun violence but is fully supportive of the 2nd Amendment (i.e. keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and gangs).
To: rktman
There’s no way “Build a Wall” Trump should be considering “Erase the Southern Border so we can have a North American Union” Petraeus for ANYTHING, but especially not Sec State!
5 posted on
11/30/2016 5:28:03 AM PST by
pgkdan
(The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
To: rktman
Gen. David Petraeus may be on the short list to be our next secretary of state, but his affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, led to him being convicted of mishandling classified information; Broadwell had access to journals of Petraeus that contained sensitive material.Is it not true that Broadwell also had a Secret or Top Secret clearance at the time? She was given material that she was not authorized to have. Is that not so?
The infraction was a thimble of water compared to an ocean in the degree of mishandling classified information. The scale and scope of damage done by Hillary has yet to be documented.
In my opinion Petraeus was persecuted by the Democrats selective enforcement of the law for political purposes.
7 posted on
11/30/2016 5:29:57 AM PST by
olezip
To: rktman
Petraeus is on record saying that ordinary civilians should not be allowed to own semi-auto "assault rifles," only the military should have them.
9 posted on
11/30/2016 5:33:30 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rktman
Probably MOST Generals are for gun control.
Past the rank of Colonel the job becomes very, very political.
Most coups and revolutions led by military people are led by Colonels.
10 posted on
11/30/2016 5:40:54 AM PST by
gaijin
To: rktman
“Shall not be infringed” means exactly what it says. I do not want anyone in President Trump’s cabinet who wants to subvert our Constitution. [BTW, I love saying “President Trump” after eight years of never using that title.]
19 posted on
11/30/2016 6:11:03 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: rktman
Yeah, ol’ Petraeus has jumped the shark as far as being qualified to work sensitive, high federal offices. With all due respect to his exemplary service prior to sticking his [censored] where it didn’t belong, he can go pound sand.
22 posted on
11/30/2016 6:20:46 AM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Hey, New Delhi! What the hell were you thinking???)
To: rktman
I see we still have FReepers trying to aid and abet the Left in handcuffing Trump - pathetic.
29 posted on
11/30/2016 6:43:08 AM PST by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: rktman
He got his gun control marching orders at the Bilderberg Conference in June.
30 posted on
11/30/2016 6:50:30 AM PST by
Despot of the Delta
(It's time for Trump to become Vlad the Impaler. I want Progressive/Globalist/Establishment heads)
To: rktman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson