Skip to comments.
A Pennsylvania recount for Hillary Clinton? A ‘nightmare scenario,’ explained (or Stein)
BillyPenn ^
| November 23, 2016
| Anna Orso
Posted on 11/24/2016 10:46:45 AM PST by bobsunshine
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Good Article - Explains what is involved and notice the "court order" because as I understand it, there would have to be massive proven voter fraud to start a recount.
To: bobsunshine
Let’s put our cards on the table. The Dems are attempting to steal the election.
If they want CWII, let’s roll.
2
posted on
11/24/2016 10:48:30 AM PST
by
Signalman
To: bobsunshine
3
posted on
11/24/2016 10:49:13 AM PST
by
Samurai_Jack
(War is cruelty, there is no use trying to reform it; the crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.)
To: bobsunshine
If they allow her a computer, she can research this from her prison cell.
4
posted on
11/24/2016 10:51:06 AM PST
by
Baynative
( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
To: bobsunshine
there would have to be massive proven voter fraud to start a recount. Then a California recount would be SOP. I think a million illegals voting qualifies as "massive vote fraud".
5
posted on
11/24/2016 10:51:59 AM PST
by
ChildOfThe60s
("If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there")
To: bobsunshine
The massive fraud was on the demoncrat side and DJT still won by 70k. Seems some leeches have a death wish.
6
posted on
11/24/2016 10:54:33 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
To: bobsunshine
The results below have been canvassed and certified by county canvassing boards, but are unofficial until certified by the Michigan Board of State Canvassers on Nov. 28. These are the numbers that will be presented to the state board for the Nov. 8 presidential election. Trump leads Clinton by 10,704 votes. 2,279,543 Donald J. Trump, Republican 2,268,839 Hillary Clinton, Democratic 172,136 Gary Johnson, Libertarian 51,463 Jill Stein, Green 16,139 Darrell L. Castle, U.S. Taxpayers 8,177 Evan McMullin, write-in 2,209 Emidio Mimi Soltysik, Natural Law 517 Michael Maturen, write-in 95 Tom Hoefling, write-in 87 Laurence Kotlikoff, write-in 39 Ben Hartnell, write-in 30 Monica Moorehead, write-in 10 Cherunda Fox, write-in http://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127-1633_8722_76444-397762--,00.html
7
posted on
11/24/2016 10:56:25 AM PST
by
Signalman
To: bobsunshine
While the commie libs “count the ballots”, Americans can spend some time at the range.
8
posted on
11/24/2016 10:58:52 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(A proud, irredeemable deplorable of the Trump Revolution.)
To: BigEdLB
I wonder if Clinton will stop this because massive illegals who voted for her would be exposed - thus her popular vote would diminish. Just thinking - doubt she cares.
To: bobsunshine
Not only will this effort go nowhere, I contend that it was designed and planned with the intention that it would go nowhere. The entire point of this idiocy is to allow propaganda media sources like Yahoo and CNN to continually cast doubts on the legitimacy of Trump’s resounding victory.
Rest assured that for the next four years we will constantly hear the Mainstream media use phrases like “Trump’s disputed election” and “Trump’s controversial victory”.
It’s time to fight back against this hard. I would love to see a nationwide examination of illegal and dead voters, I doubt that this would favor Clinton.
To: Signalman
She'll never do it ...
She was kept alive with bubble gum and scotch tape for the election process and barely survived it.
She is glad it's all over and she can be a doddering gra'maw ... Bill is gone, Huma is gone and Chelsea is politely a daughter ... all she's got is grand babies.
11
posted on
11/24/2016 11:03:02 AM PST
by
knarf
(I say things that are true .. I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: bobsunshine
I wonder if evidence of massive fraud that favored Clinton would be obvious in Pennsylvania, and would negate her claims that there is evidence of fraud. For example, precincts in Philly where Trump got suspiciously few votes, or where Hillary got more than the number of registered voters, as happened in 2012. This possibility may be why Obama is discouraging the effort.
This will give the terminally stupid something to claim about this election for decades to come.
12
posted on
11/24/2016 11:03:50 AM PST
by
Defiant
(The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
To: bobsunshine
"secret computer scientists"
13
posted on
11/24/2016 11:04:13 AM PST
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: ChildOfThe60s; bobsunshine
"
there would have to be massive proven voter fraud to start a recount. Then a California recount would be SOP. I think a million illegals voting qualifies as "massive vote fraud"."
=========================================================================================================
No way a recount should be done in those selective states. A recount of the entire election would have to be done to remove all the votes by FOREIGNERS, those that voted multiple times and votes by dead people.
Oh, and every single military vote must be counted.
Hillary would not only still loose, but she would be several million behind Trump in the popular vote.
Claim: 3 million votes cast by non-citizens (2016 election)
Noncitizens, Voting Violations and U.S. Elections
14
posted on
11/24/2016 11:04:57 AM PST
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: Signalman
Lets put our cards on the table. The Dems are attempting to steal the election.I think not.
Oh, they'd take the theft if they could pull it off. But, I don't think they think they can. They're just softening the ground for future election contests.
Dems have no respect for a "fair fight and it's over." They'll lose a fight and attack from behind as the winner turns his back.
So, this is just more of the same. I'd bet Jill is being funded by Hillary sympathizers, or even by Hillary's campaign. Raising $3million in a week to pay for the recount seems like a lot. Is it more than Jill ran her whole campaign on? I wonder.
To: Junk Silver
"
The entire point of this idiocy is to allow propaganda media sources like Yahoo and CNN to continually cast doubts on the legitimacy of Trumps resounding victory."
Yup, that's all this is.
16
posted on
11/24/2016 11:06:27 AM PST
by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: Junk Silver
I would love to see a nationwide examination of illegal and dead voters With the resources of the DOJ, this would be possible and it could and should lead to indictments. That would then set up legislation to standardize voter ID laws and registration requirements for federal elections. Those would be thrown out as "racist" by Obama's district court judges, and then upheld by Trump's Supreme Court, in time for the 2020 election. In fact, the legislation should have a fast track provision that gets it to the SC within 6 months, or directly.
17
posted on
11/24/2016 11:09:15 AM PST
by
Defiant
(The media is the colostomy bag where truth goes after democrats digest it.)
To: Signalman
Do they really want to start something? I do not think the elite of the dimwitcrat party sees the big picture. CW II would end up with such strict voter ID and SCOTUS justices removed. Also participants would no be allowed to vote ay more. Most universities humanities courses would be shut down with Nuremberg trials for leftist totalitarian professors tried for treason. New massive prison in Northeast Alaska, with polar bears and wolves as ‘natural’ prison guards. ANY attempt to steal the election would be dire...
18
posted on
11/24/2016 11:10:07 AM PST
by
BigEdLB
(To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
To: bobsunshine
Not going to happen.
A final clutch at a straw as the drowning Dems go under for the last time.
19
posted on
11/24/2016 11:11:55 AM PST
by
henbane
To: knarf
An insightful analysis, actually.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson