Replies

They are not going to be extinct because you cannot kill 24% of the entire world’s population which is spread over a vast area of the globe. They are not all in the Middle East.

Besides being wrong to kill billions of people, it is not doable. It is an impotent fantasy. We couldn’t do it even if we wanted to do it.

A more realistic goal is to keep them out of Western countries and from taking over any more territory. Given their fast growing population (and the rapidly declining population of Western peoples) even this might not be doable in the long run, though I’m projecting several centuries ahead on that one. For the purposes of the next 10 or so generations, we should focus on containment.

At the first provocation, let's get started on that 24% and see how far we go. Iran wants nuclear weapons. Do you want them to have them? Is it only fair???? Tell them we will have on site inspection and they will dismantle each and eery facility or we will. If they insist on being nuked, make sure no mullahs survive.

They are not all in the Middle East. Perhaps it is time to send them back. They do not belong here or in Europe. Other nations can make their own decisions.

Containment can have temporary uses but it is not a long term strategy. These lunatics have been running wild long enough and then some. The Middle East is the problem. If they give the Chinese grief, the Chinese will terminate them in China. Likewise India, our ally, just itching to get it on with Pakistan which also should not have nukes and sheltered Osama bin Laden, etc.

The population decline in the West is curable by a determined policy to increase birthrates and a determination to return from materialism run amok to having large families, banning abortion, discouraging birth control methods, gearing tax policy to reward large families, etc.

If current examples are not enough to justify crushing the Islamofascists, then see the movie Khartoum and what the Mahdi and his lunatics did to a very humane British General China Gordon in the 19th century.

As to what is doable, you apparently would be quite surprised as to what even one Ohio Class submarine can do, much less a fleet of them.

I took the trouble to backtrack your claim that I had called for the extinction of the Muslims. You first raised this obsession in your #86 in response to my #83. What I said in #83 is that we CAN wipe them out and they well know it not that we SHOULD wipe them out. I also said that we did not have to pick and choose (between Shia and Sunni satrapies) and that IF we did wipe out the feuding Sunni and Shia satrapies we would have helped neither side and it would be a win all around. There would be no more Muslim "civil war" because tey all lose.

You persistently introduce red herrings into this argument. I never advocated killing all Muslims, just as many as we need to kill. You also introduced (without justification) Malaysia because it is 61% Muslim. I haven't heard of any threate from Malaysia. Have you? If they threaten, we will deal with them as necessary.