Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expat_panama
There may not have been a direct cause-effect relationship between the deregulation of the banking industry in the late 1990s and the collapse of the real estate market in 2008, but that's a poor argument to make against the re-institution of the Glass-Steagall regulations.

There's simply no way in hell that a bank whose deposits are guaranteed by the Federal government should ever be permitted to engage in risky -- even speculative -- lending and investment practices. The whole purpose of Glass-Steagall was to separate the commercial banking industry from the mortgage banking industry. The operating environments for these two industries are so different -- largely due to different tax laws and the aforementioned depositor protection -- that they should function completely separately.

4 posted on 11/19/2016 11:07:32 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
the deregulation of the banking industry in the late 1990s

We hear all the time from the extreme left that there was "deregulation of the banking industry in the late 1990s", and it never seems to matter that virtually all the Glass-Stiegel act remains while mountains of new regs were passed (like forcing banks to loan to penniless minorities).

7 posted on 11/19/2016 11:37:35 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson