[Alberta's Child]

The Senate can (and should) end the whole filibuster practice tomorrow. It has no basis in Constitutional law.

If it's worth having it, then the Constitution should be amended to require a 60% vote in the Senate for any Federal law to be passed.

[DoodleDawg]

The Senate can (and should) end the whole filibuster practice tomorrow. It has no basis in Constitutional law.

The Constitution allows each house to set its own rules.

[aquila48]

” If it’s worth having it, then the Constitution should be amended to require a 60% vote in the Senate for any Federal law to be passed.”

I would be all in favor of requiring a super majority to pass any law, since laws by definition restrict freedom, thus I want the vast majority of people to agree on having their freedom restricted.