Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine
Better to have national Constitutional carry.

True, but it's a worthy concession to make seeing as how our electorate is mostly FEmale now as opposed to when the 2nd was adopted.

We might not get such an amendment with our current electorate.

13 posted on 11/12/2016 3:31:50 AM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

I don’t think we need to have a States right issue taken over by DC like they have done in so many other areas.

Just bypass that and go to Constutional carry. That is where it is headed anyway. We have 11 States already with it plus Puerto Rico.


85 posted on 11/12/2016 5:27:17 AM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger

Let’s go at this the same way the left does. We take a step in the right direction, then we take the next step.

One of the beautiful things about this election is that it’s going to let us take some might big steps!


109 posted on 11/12/2016 6:25:04 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: papertyger

Why would we need an amendment? Federal law supersedes state and local and we already have an amendment. Seemswe could do it with a law.


137 posted on 11/12/2016 7:43:35 AM PST by vortec94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson