1 posted on
11/10/2016 11:44:38 AM PST by
Strac6
To: Strac6
He is wrong about one thing.
I have always voted. I have never said/thought i was going to vote, and didnt do it.
I dont think nearly everyone says this, he is wrong about that.
2 posted on
11/10/2016 11:46:56 AM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Strac6
Give me Dr Norpoth over Nate Silver any day
3 posted on
11/10/2016 11:47:27 AM PST by
scottinoc
To: Strac6
The model has been correct for every election since 1912 except for the 1960 election which pitted John F. Kennedy against Richard Nixon.
And we all know why JFK won in 1960.
4 posted on
11/10/2016 11:47:47 AM PST by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Strac6
Havent people said nixon may have actually won in 1960?
5 posted on
11/10/2016 11:48:13 AM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Strac6
I’d guess that if you took fraud out of the picture, the good professors projected percentages would be darned close.
6 posted on
11/10/2016 11:50:45 AM PST by
chrisser
To: Strac6
He probably wasn’t wrong about the voting percentages, given the level of voter fraud perpetrated by the Dims.
7 posted on
11/10/2016 11:51:17 AM PST by
klgator
To: Strac6
The size and enthusiasm of Trump’s rallies said it all, to me, and the fact that they never petered out like Cankles’ did.
8 posted on
11/10/2016 11:54:07 AM PST by
Lizavetta
To: Strac6
Vote fraud in the vote-rich, Dem-controlled big cities could account for the near tie in popular vote.
9 posted on
11/10/2016 11:54:23 AM PST by
luvbach1
(We are finished. It will just take a while before everyone realizes it.)
To: Strac6
Dark helmut rules the universe.
10 posted on
11/10/2016 11:55:32 AM PST by
BRL
To: Strac6
His reasoning stood up. That is, the party primaries predict the actual election in terms of turnout.
The Dems has several million fewer votes 2016 compared to 2008, 2012. The Dem primary turnout predicted this. The Republican had about the same number of votes in 2016, so any gloating is at our peril.
12 posted on
11/10/2016 11:59:56 AM PST by
cicero2k
To: Strac6
The model has been correct for every election since 1912 except for the 1960 election which pitted John F. Kennedy against Richard Nixon.Well, it may have been right that time, too, save for some shenanigans.
13 posted on
11/10/2016 12:00:32 PM PST by
Major Matt Mason
(Those that can, do, those that can't, work in the Beltway.)
To: Strac6
My brother in law wrote a small book last December saying why Trump would be elected.
His reasoning back then was exactly how it happened!
14 posted on
11/10/2016 12:02:12 PM PST by
HereInTheHeartland
(I don't want better government; I want much less of it.)
To: Strac6
The model has been correct for every election since 1912 except for the 1960 election which pitted John F. Kennedy against Richard Nixon. Except he was right in 1960 since no model can project a random factor like Voter Fraud. No one doubts now that the difference in the 1960 election was the urban Democrat machines voter fraud.
25 posted on
11/10/2016 12:43:19 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
("This revolt is not ending, it is merely beginning.” Pat Caddell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson