Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Professor Who Long Ago Forecast A Trump Triumph Basks In The Warm Glow Of Being Right
Daily Caller ^

Posted on 11/10/2016 11:44:38 AM PST by Strac6

Once-obscure political science professor Helmut Norpoth is now basking in the sweet glow of success — and newfound fame — after confidently predicting way back in February that Donald Trump was virtually guaranteed to win the 2016 presidential election.

Norpoth, a faculty member at Stony Brook University, announced his prognostication that Trump would defeat Hillary Clinton some 262 days ago. He asserted a confidence level of 97 percent in what he calls the Primary Model, he said.

On Tuesday, the professor’s prophecy was proven right. Voter intent doesn’t matter, he said. Instead, the things that really matter are excitement among primary voters and certain cyclical patterns.

“Nearly all of us say, oh yes, I’ll vote, and then many will not follow through,” Norpoth told the website.

“The bottom line is that the primary model, using also the cyclical movement, makes it almost certain that Donald Trump will be the next president,” Norpoth initially said in February, according to The Statesman, the campus newspaper at Stony Brook, a public bastion on New York’s Long Island.

“When I started out with this kind of display a few months ago, I thought it was sort of a joke,” the professor told an alumni audience. “Well, I’ll tell you right now, it ain’t a joke anymore.”

“Take it to the bank,” he added.

Norpoth specifically predicted that Trump had a 97 percent chance of beating Democrat Hillary Clinton and a 99 percent chance of beating Bernie Sanders, a socialist running as a Democrat.

In the many months since Norpoth first trumpeted his forecast, he has made countless media appearances.

The professor did turn out to be considerably wrong about the voting percentages. He said Trump receive 54.7 percent of the popular vote to Clinton’s 45.3 percent.

Norpoth, a 1974 University of Michigan Ph.D. recipient who specializes in electoral behavior alignment, said his data pointed to a 61-percent chance that the Republican nominee — Trump or not — would win the 2016 presidential election.

Norpoth’s general election formula measures candidates’ performances in primaries and caucuses to gauge party unity and excitement. It also focuses on patterns in electoral cycles. One major assumption is that the party which just held the presidency for two consecutive terms is less likely to win a third term.

The model has been correct for every election since 1912 except for the 1960 election — which pitted John F. Kennedy against Richard Nixon.

He has said he has used the model in recent times to predict Bill Clinton’s victories as well as George W. Bush’s wins and Barack Obama’s wins.

In total, Norpoth observed, the forecasting formula he has created has been correct 96.1 percent of the time since 1912.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: academia; clinton; donaldtrump; helmutnorpoth; hillary; hillaryclinton; norpoth; predictions; primarymodel; stonybrook; stonybrooku; trump; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: trebb

His quote:

“Nearly all of us say, oh yes, I’ll vote, and then many will not follow through,” Norpoth told the website.

I used his words. Didnt put mine in. NEARLY ALL. HIS WORDS.


21 posted on 11/10/2016 12:22:54 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

Nixon said no, the nation thought it has elected the Bold and Beautiful Kennedy. Such disclosure would make Nixon president of an ungovernable country... and the Electoral Collage might still have gone for JFK.

I know this because, after retiring from the Bureau, two of the SAs involved became lecturers at my law school.

...

The end result was the Kennedys got killed, Nixon became president of an ungovernable country and had to resign. But other crooked politicians (such as the surviving Kennedy) successfully began their campaign of dumbing down the population so it would repeatedly vote crooks into office.


22 posted on 11/10/2016 12:31:46 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Nixon won in ‘60. Everyone knew JFK’s “win” was the result of cheating. His father said, “Don’t buy a single vote more than necessary. I’ll be damned if I’m going to pay for a landslide.”

I guess they were stuffing ballot boxes in Chicago or something.


23 posted on 11/10/2016 12:33:07 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (Rev. Jeffress re Trump: "He may not be like us, but he likes us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

I said you were right -isn’t that what you wanted?


24 posted on 11/10/2016 12:36:18 PM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Strac6
The model has been correct for every election since 1912 except for the 1960 election — which pitted John F. Kennedy against Richard Nixon.

Except he was right in 1960 since no model can project a random factor like Voter Fraud. No one doubts now that the difference in the 1960 election was the urban Democrat machines voter fraud.

25 posted on 11/10/2016 12:43:19 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("This revolt is not ending, it is merely beginning.” Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

MI and Detroit were also the fraud keys in 1960. They flipped MI and IL. That won it for Kennedy.


26 posted on 11/10/2016 12:46:44 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("This revolt is not ending, it is merely beginning.” Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

You are right. Please see #15


27 posted on 11/10/2016 1:14:07 PM PST by Strac6 (Be banded together to defeat The Hildabeast. All the rest is east easy s**t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Strac6

Thank you! Intresting info there.


28 posted on 11/11/2016 5:10:49 AM PST by MNJohnnie ("This revolt is not ending, it is merely beginning.” Pat Caddell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson