Posted on 11/10/2016 7:53:11 AM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Shout this from the rooftops, it was an ELECTORAL LANDSLIDE! 306!
And, minus the illegitimate alien vote, Trump won the Popular vote by a few million.
On word, mandate.......
I think they are doing this on purpose to gin up more anger from the losers. They still have not added Arizona or Michigan into his total.
A blowout.
And destruction of Clinton and Bush dynasties.
Now the work begins.
That's quite a math error.
306 = 57% of the electoral votes.
Aye! Mandate!
Absolutely. Looking forward to the Mandate President wielding his big stick. Drain the Swamp and Reset America.
Welcome to reality.
Must be Metric EV’s..............
The media wants the narrative to be the popular vote. Well let them do it because we all know that there was a lot of voter fraud and election fraud in the popular vote.
1. Investigate and prosecute the on the ground voter fraud.
2. Look closely at the voting machines and contracts with municipalities and companies like Dominion.
3. Forbid all counting that uses non-integer or “fractional” voting.
4. Any statistical spread in similar demographic districts within a state that uses paper ballots vs. machines needs to be investigated for fraud. This happened with sanders in CA and MA.
If you remove California (communist) from the mix, the blowout was even worse.
It is the best evidence that the purpose of the Electoral College has been fulfilled.
couldn’t find it in Geller’s article.
They haven’t added NH either.
I think they aren’t finishing the election to keep it looking like it wasn’t a landslide - to get a couple of more news-cycles showing it was neck-in-neck....when it wasn’t.
http://interactives.ap.org/2016/general-election/?SITE=APQA
Without California, the electoral vote would have been 306 to 177. There would be close to a 2:1 margin in the House and 2 fewer Democrat senators. The popular vote, including the dead folks in Philly and double voters in Miami, would have been 56.7 million Trump to 54.4 million Hillary.
From a electoral point of view, yeah it was probably a landslide, but to be on a more pragmatic view, if the candidate doesn’t get both majority popular vote, and majority electoral vote I wouldn’t want to call it a landslide.
Great Post!
Pisses me off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.