Posted on 11/09/2016 9:00:29 AM PST by springwater13
It took nearly 16 hours to determine but Michigan is officially with Donald Trump.
Trump has won a hard fought battle for Michigan’s 16 electoral votes.
Just after 11:20 a.m. Wednesday, Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson released the final popular vote totals.
In the presidential race Donald Trump received 2,277,586 votes to Hillary Clinton’s 2,264,361.
Trump recorded a razor-thin margin in the 83 county total: 47.60 percent to Clinton’s 47.33 percent.
It’s a key win that few saw coming in Trump’s quest for the 270 votes that could make him the next president of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at wlns.com ...
As a Bama fan I will also say thank you Big Ten. The South got this started and the rust belt put us over the top.
Bump!
Yep. The Bernie folks are going to have to do a little work to explain that away.
The margin of victory shrunk dangerously and suddenly late in MI, but there are only so many bogus ballots to be "found."
The PA win was the big shocker. A yuge debt of gratitude goes out to all those poll watchers across the land! Notice was served and obviously dented the number of usual fraudulent votes.
Exactly 100 more electoral votes than that snake Mitt Romney got.
Who ????
Actually Trump won when the voting time ran out in Michigan.
The tv whores like to pretend otherwise to maintain audiences.
He came within a fraction of a percent of winning MN. ALL of Cankles’ margin in MN was in early vote.
Trump won election day there 2:1
and the Amish ... they came out BIGLY for Trump ...
Dear Slimy Pollster Frauds (and especially Larry Sabato and his "Crystal Ball"):
READ IT AND WEEP!!
And a special thanks to Mr. Julian Assange and his crew...who may have just saved civilization (now now.)
289 + 16 = 305 and if Trump wins NH, it’ll be 309.
Around 10pm last night the NY Times real time map had a projection of Trump with about 65% chance of winning with 280 votes, give or take. Nobody on TV was saying that. By midnight or so they were projecting over 300 with 90+ % chance. They were on point all night and waaaay ahead of the networks. They showed PA with 65% chance of going to Trump when the networks were saying it was still a virtual lock for Hillary. I thought I’d never say these words but kudos to the New York Times.
He won it last night, but the sleazy media refused to acknowledge the fact.
SIX STATES THAT HELPED HUSSEIN SEIZE POWER HAVE BEEN FLIPPED.
THAT IS YUUUUUUUGE!
The Google equivalent was good also, but not as fast as the NYT system.
Just more proof we have zero need for Faux/ABCNNBCBS phoney news.
Some guy who was the son of the former governor of Michigan but couldn’t win that state because it’s impossible for the GOP. Or rather it was until last night...
Not looking like he’ll win NH. Oh well, no big deal.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/forecast/president/new-hampshire
Still, Trump did very well there. Better than I expected.
The Google equivalent was good also, but not as fast as the NYT system.
Just more proof we have zero need for Faux/ABCNNBCBS phoney news.
First thing I’ve seen decent from the NYT. I’ll give them credit for a reasonable tool.
I have seen this coming for twenty years.
Have lived in enough of these places that I KNEW the first candidate who came along promising to rollback globalist trade and MEAN IT would stampede through the Rust Belt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.