We would not have had Bill Clinton as president if not for the women’s vote.
We would not have had Barack Obama as president if not for the women’s vote.
We should not have had George Bush, if not for the women’s vote.
I rest my case. In the instance of Bush, he would not have been our nominee if not for the women’s vote.
We would have had a sound candidate instead. We would not have had eight years of terrible leadership, and a melt down that nearly turned our nation flat on it’s back.
As you were saying?
I think you missed what I was saying.
Women are the largest voting block out. Period.
To discount how influential even small SHIFTS in that block are is disastrous. Hopefully conservative campaigns in the future will not be so blind. It’s important.
Just as insulting conservatives was not a good campaign strategy for Democrats (it backfired), insulting women as a whole is a disastrous campaign strategy for conservatives going forward. Even if you do not win all the women’s votes, you can steadily shift the PERCENTAGE and that will have far greater effects.
This is math.