Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The term "wholesale election fraud" refers to one act by a fraudster that changes a large number of votes, such as in a computer, or alters the vote totals hoping no one will audit the results and verify the totals. "Retail election fraud" refers to cheating one vote at a time, such as when people cast multiple absentee ballots or vote multiple times in person in an election. These people are known in the trade as "repeaters," and their ability to repeat vote is greatly enhanced both by early voting and by either lax enforcement of voter ID laws or no voter ID requirement.
1 posted on 11/08/2016 4:54:15 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: detective

what would you have us do the day of the election besides worry? Trump has a load of lawyers and I’m sure he won’t take anything sitting down.


2 posted on 11/08/2016 5:02:20 AM PST by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Parents lived thirty five years in South FL. Lots of voters from MI, NY, IL, and other points North with dual registration. That was ten to twenty years ago. You can bet the number of dual registrations has doubled from those days not to mention electronic voting and early voting entering the picture.


3 posted on 11/08/2016 5:08:33 AM PST by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and. the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

send her just 10 more dollars....


4 posted on 11/08/2016 5:15:05 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The sad part is, the same technology that allows them to easily commit fraud could also almost entirely prevent fraud.

For example, we could just encrypt votes, giving the voter a private key at the time of registration, so nobody could ever vote for them and their vote could not be tampered with after they cast it. We could also easily mark those keys as disabled by cross-referencing death databases so the dead couldn’t vote.

The fact that politicians choose to use the technology insecurely instead of securely just tells you they prefer a system with fraud to one without it.


5 posted on 11/08/2016 5:22:59 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Unless it integrates with the target database it won’t work. It is easy to write some proof of concept that works on web results downloaded into a spreadsheet. But real results are in some sort of database that the program will have to know about and integrate with.


7 posted on 11/08/2016 5:39:07 AM PST by palmer (turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Surprise! Surprise!

Both vote “tabulating” machines in Old Greenwich, Connecticut were “not functioning” this morning. BOTH!

A “coincidence”?

This “malfunction” may make it easier for the DOJ “monitors” sent to Connecticut to “under-count” the huge Republican majority in Old Greenwich.

Are other “tabulators” not functioning in other Republican areas?

Soros knows...


11 posted on 11/08/2016 6:32:52 AM PST by pfony1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Well, the good news is it’s only voter fraud when your side loses.


12 posted on 11/08/2016 6:43:14 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson