Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFreeBird

A couple billion, because we can’t make them any more. Have to start production from scratch. Then we have to rebuild a ship to fire them.


37 posted on 11/07/2016 6:43:44 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

What exactly does a 16” HE shell entail, from a manufacturing point of view?

I mean, if the Democrat fairy godmother were to wave her magic wand, and remove all guns from the face of the earth tomorrow, how hard, in this day and age, would it be, to start making them again.

Yea, I know, any ship in mothballs or museum berths are gonna take some effort and expense to recommission.

that wasn’t really my point.

I’m an IT nerd going back to when Algore invented the internet. Those of us from that time, and perhaps from those that came after, and probably predates me by a wide margin, had a saying.

When high tech fails - Low tech RULES!

I was only trying to point out, that there are less expensive ways to throw projectiles downrange. We humans have been doing it for many millennia.

$800K a pop! What commander wants to be on the hook for that kind of expenditure? What kind of paperwork and review will be involved? And how many in the magazine?

Not to mention: will it work as advertised?

I’m cynical. In this day and age, can you blame me?

Ike warned us about the dangers of the Military/Industrial complex; He was right.

And God help us - Hillary wants control of it.


47 posted on 11/07/2016 7:24:18 PM PST by AFreeBird (BEST. ELECTION. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson