Posted on 11/05/2016 8:41:04 PM PDT by Freedom of Speech Wins
*WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT* These are the photos that Bill and Hillary Clinton don't want the world to see! Dark, disturbing, and seriously perverted, the images were taken during an October 2005 police raid of the Palm Beach home of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Close friends with Bill, Epstein once bragged that he helped found the Clinton Foundation, and hosted Hillary's husband on his private jet — nicknamed the "Lolita Express" — more than ten times, according to flight logs. The Clintons distanced themselves from their former friend after he pleaded guilty to procuring an underage prostitute in June 2008, but these never-before-seen photos obtained by RadarOnline.com, along with dozens of pages of police incident reports, reveal a glimpse at just how sordid the Clintons' inner circle could be.
(Excerpt) Read more at radaronline.com ...
This site is more like a click bait site than a real information providing site.
This site sucks. Shouldn’t be on here.
These threads are intended to lose the election by distracting Trump’s supporters.
Spreading the word without checking out the pictures....
"The evidence of criminal activity identified via Anthony Wiener’s laptop is so damning that the NYPD was preparing arrest warrants for a number of Clinton campaign officials"
Probably not BS, but at this point it is just noise. Until there is a definitive link to Bill the charge won’t stick.
There’s a low signal to noise content in all of that stuff. There’s adequate bandwidth to handle the noise at this point, so no big deal. But at some point the real fight against Hillary will get drowned by this stuff.
That's true, it's not at all like Abu Grahib where everyone instantly knew that George Bush personally put underwear on the heads of terrorists.
There is more provocative art in world class museums. This post is BS. Please remove.
I was curious as to who the Congressional people were that were supposed to be on the same plane.
That info might tell you more about the DemocRAT party also.
Yes. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan. “If you can’t verify it, you can’t trust it”.
With the Clintons and related topics, I have modified Reagan’s original comment. You can never trust the Clintons and there are some on-line posters you can’t verify as honest, accurate, or even who they say they are.
We need to be very careful of what we read and repeat, which is why I have long ago learned to use the caveat “if it is accurate/trust or a trustworthy source” to discuss some online postings/articles.
I learned about the Soviet “Disinformatzia” program from our best internal/counter-intelligence people, so I know how it works, from all political and many ideological sides.
That works.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
