No, we don't. But frankly, this sets up a bonafide charge under the Espionage Act, if there's proof the Russians got their hands on classified information.
This goes WAY beyond simple mishandling of classified info.
Something really stinks about Benghazi.
Here’s the Wikileaks version:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272
Cheryl Mills to Hillary and Podesta [and others such as Brian Fallon] ...
They quoted a committee question [which Mills responds to with typical spin]
Q: The State Department says that at least 16 of the emails that Sid Blumenthal turned over to the Benghazi Select Committee were not included in the 55,000 pages of materials produced by Hillary Clinton. Doesn’t this prove that Hillary Clinton deleted certain emails at some point before producing them to the Department?
[unquote]
Further discussion of this email is here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3480742/posts
~~~~
Hillary: “At this point what difference does it make!”
Would she say that if someone shoved a bayonet up her anus? That’s REAL torture. And could have been avoided.
I’m sleepy, so keeping in mind I might not have this exactly right:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9272
This caught my attention:
“OFF RECORD, if pressed on whether we are essentially admitting the possibility that she deleted some emails” [snip] ...
Then it seems like they are brainstorming spin:
But even if Sid is right and some of these documents were at some point sent to Clinton, there is nothing in any of these emails that is remotely new or interesting. Indeed, none of these 16 emails are qualitatively different than the dozens of others that Hillary already produced to the State Department. [snip]
Seems to confirm the blog’s take that gave our forum the ‘heads up’:
Wikileaks: Leaked email reveals Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi cover-up
Conservative Outfitters | October 14, 2016
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3480742/posts