Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Viennacon
I think you've got a good sense of where this is going. I'd just make a few comments:

1. Your assessment of PA and MI seems strange. I would have thought MI would be more of a long-shot for Trump than PA. I can't envision a scenario where PA goes for Clinton and MI goes for Trump. If those two are split, I think for sure it will be the other way around.

2. Michigan is a stronger state for Trump than Florida is?

3. Pennsylvania and Michigan are stronger for Trump than Virginia is?

78 posted on 11/05/2016 12:26:00 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Virginia is now a statist hell hole.


82 posted on 11/05/2016 12:32:02 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

PA and Michigan are DEFINITELY stronger for Trump than Virginia. I don’t fully trust the two polls we saw. Virginia has just been flooded with federal employees. It isnt an industrial state.

On the Michigan Pennsylvania split: I am basing this largely on the turnout operations in each state. Michigan’s democratic machine has decayed with Detroit. Absentee ballots for Detroit this time in 2012 were 12.5% higher than they are at present. We’ve seen similar polls out of both states calling the race a tie, but I’d bank more on an upset in Michigan than in Pennsylvania, owing to organization and Detroit performing worse than Philly for dems.


93 posted on 11/05/2016 12:37:54 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson