Posted on 11/05/2016 5:23:52 AM PDT by JayGalt
Julie has three more days to sell T-shirts, he better shoot his load
Later
Provides excellent background and perspective. Thank you.
So Julian believes Trump supporters are deplorable and irredeemable, himself. Perhaps he doesn’t realize that his best chances for his freedom are for the deplorable supporters to win. For we truly are not the deplorable, they are the ones in control.
But it is ESSENTIAL. Forget the interview. Read the analysis on Reddit connecting the whole Middle East mess to Saudi Arabia
Here is the opening analysis on that thread:
...Pay attention because it is far more subtle than american audiences would like. He is outlining actual treason
Funding and aiding an enemy of the state, by using the state department which arguably implicates Obama because it is his executive branch. South Korea is forcing President Park Geun-hye to flee for her life for similar accusations right now. Can we at least get a march going? Europe is going to be pissed. Anticipate anti US marches in Berlin, Paris and London.
This is hard evidence that the US destabilized Africa in order to get Clinton elected. It would be damaging if it stopped there but it also shows how Clinton armed ISIS which further exacerbated the refugee crisis. The Refugee Crisis would be bad on its own if not for the fact that aiding an enemy of the state is actually truthfully treason, not this "treason" that we have been throwing around for months about shady primary elections or prospecting financial investments in Cuba, but actual Benedict Arnold arming ISIS treason. If you are a liberal ask yourself how you feel about Iran/Contra and if you want to be the one defending it for the next 40 years because this mass migration taking place in Europe is the biggest thing to happen there since WW2. The memory of this wound will not fade quickly, and if soccer has taught me anything, its that Europe is good at holding a grudge. This is bigger than if Trump had in fact shot someone on 5th avenue. This is 200 french concert goers getting murdered by ISIS with American weapons just so France could have a Patriot act of its very own. This is evidence that the TRILLIONS of dollars being spent on refugees in all of Europe is a bill to set at the feet of America. This is why Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan were attacked. This is how Brussels was bombed. This is why the the UK left the EU. This is why hundreds of women in Scandinavia and Germany are being raped and assaulted. This is why Turkey may leave NATO. This is why Russia may invade the rest of Ukraine. This is why Trump wants to build a fucking wall. Assange did not over-hype the ramifications of US involvement in Syria.
Stop waiting for CNN to confirm how damaging this is. Remember Shepherd Smith talking about Hurricane Mathew? You dont need that. This is enough if you want it; you need to assemble and march and take your country. This is it. This is all you get. The revolution will not be televised. Nor will it be there to incite your passions. Stoke the fires of justice in yourself. You need to march on DC today. TODAY. IS SOUTH KOREA MORE PATRIOTIC THAN AMERICA!? THEN GET OUT THERE AND SHOW YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY FOR FUCKS SAKE! #marchonDC #JulianIsDead Its worth noting that nothing in this video suggests Assange is safe in the Embassy. Watch it again and you may see the edit where you dont see Pilger ask the question about the FBI investigation and Assange only makes a statement about the purpose of the FBI. Also Pilger makes a statement about the last week of the campaign and Assange never addresses that statement. #freeJulian
REPLY POST by-life long Democrat
EDTI: CTR [Correct the Record] is trying to distract you from this. DONT YOU FUCKING DARE START WITH THAT SHITPOSTING RIGHT NOW. THEY UPVOTE IT TO HIDE THE REAL SHIT LIKE THIS BASED AUSSIE. THIS NEEDS TO BE YOUR PRIORITY. THIS IS HOW YOU FORCE CNN TO COVER TREASON. DONT LISTEN TO ANYONE TELLING YOU NOT TO #MARCHONDC. DO IT IF YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE IN YOUR TOWN WITH A CARDBOARD SIGN ON A STREET CORNER OUTSIDE OF A 7/11. PATRIOT THE FUCK UP! (note: no one is promoting violence)
EDIT 2: CTR CLOCKS IN JUST A FEW MINUTES; AT 7:45am EDT OP's POST IS AT 80% UPVOTED. WE CAN DO BETTER
Edit 3: 9:04am EDT and OPs Post sits at 67% CTR has arrived, everyone its been a pleasure.
EDIT 4: 9:26AM EDT 64% AND FALLING PEDES! WE STRUCK A NERVE!
permalinkembedsavereportgive goldreply
[–]goonsackMAGA 224 points 4 hours ago
Treason is right. Even months ago I had seen enough to come to the conclusion that Obama and Hillary are guilty of it. What has come out since then in the Podesta emails only strengthens the case by proving the influence that the Gulf monarchies have on our politics. When Trump said Obama and Hillary were the founders of ISIS he was castigated by the lying media without mercy. But he was absolutely right, in the sense that ISIS would not exist but for the actions of these two traitors. This is the smoking gun memo to look at, and it shows that the genesis of ISIS in Iraq and Syria is traceable to the administration's own policies: http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287-293-JW-v-DOD-and-State-14-812-DOD-Release-2015-04-10-final-version11.pdf It's a DIA memo partially declassified under FOIA by Judicial Watch, and it was written in 2012. The memo states that "THE SALAFIST, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND AQI ARE THE MAJOR FORCES DRIVING THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA". It also states that "THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION".
Elsewhere, it says, "OPPOSITION FORCES ARE TRYING TO CONTROL THE EASTERN AREAS (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN IRAQI PROVINCES (MOSUL AND ANBAR), IN ADDITION TO NEIGHBORING TURKISH BORDERS. WESTERN COUNTRIES, THE GULF STATES AND TURKEY ARE SUPPORTING THESE EFFORTS". And also: "IF THE SITUATION UNRAVELS THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME", and "ISI COULD ALSO DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA". So, to review: US intelligence knew that the anti-Assad opposition were primarily made up of radical Islamists (i.e. Salafists, AQ, and the Muslim Brotherhood). The memo also states that the West (which would include the US), the Gulf States, and Turkey support this opposition and their efforts to control Eastern Syria. The memo does not split hairs and delineate that we only support the "moderate elements". In fact, that term or related terms describing moderate rebels appear nowhere in the memo. Underscoring that the US was supporting the opposition regardless of its makeup, the last two passage I cited make clear that the "supporting powers" (elsewhere defined as the West, Gulf States, & Turkey) actually want a Salafist principality (Islamic State) to emerge in Eastern Syria, because it would undermine Assad's hold on Syria. The "moderate rebels" narrative is just not present in the DIA memo. The moderate rebels only seem to exist in State Department PR, White House PR, and mainstream media. If the moderate rebels ever did exist, they were likely just cutouts for funneling money and weapons into the arms of Al Nusra (i.e. AQ), ISIS, and other radical Islamists.
Some people say that the creation of ISIS and the arming of this and other Islamist jihadist groups were an unintended consequence of Obama's and Hillary's policy, and not a goal of that policy itself. I just don't buy that it was merely an unintended consequence. The DIA memo makes clear that the Syrian opposition, even though it was dominated by Islamist extremists, was supported by the West. This support included their efforts to take Eastern Syria and establish a Salafist principality (Islamic State) there.
While the memo doesn't specify if this support was material support or just "cheering them on", there is an abundance of evidence documenting that US arms ended up in the hands of ISIS and other terrorists in Syria/Iraq. The Obama administration and their cheerleaders/apologists can claim "unintended consequences" as an aspect of plausible deniability, but I don't find it plausible. The consequences of the Obama admin's actions were entirely predictable. Did they not expect weapons and arms to eventually reach the most powerful opposition forces in Syria, i.e. AQ/Salafists/MB? What was their expected endgame for Syria? Even if they were able to topple Assad by supporting the so-called "moderate elements", did they expect that these moderates would assume control of Syria after Assad being deposed? To think that would happen is absurd. If the moderate elements ever existed at all, the DIA memo makes clear that they'd be outnumbered by the aforementioned jihadist elements of the opposition. And the Obama administration knew these elements were the main factions making up the opposition. The Obama administration's intended policy for Syria (and the policy of the Gulf monarchies) was to topple Assad by whatever means necessary, even if that meant instrumentalizing ISIS and other terrorist groups for this purpose, and they did not care if this meant that extremists would take control of post-Assad Syria.
Excellent video and interview.
It validates the “insurgent” or revolutionary view of the Trump election.
Excellent information about Wikileaks as well.
This one is complicated but very worthy of your highlighting.
He win will be in for a very big surprise come November 9, 2016.
Trump wins.
America’s BREXIT.
If Hillary wins, mark my words, they will plant the seeds of a VIOLENT REVOLT, and they WILL SPROUT.
Thank you for the ping. I review every article posted to the Forum. For some reason, this one is not showing up on my Forum page, which is set to “Everything.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.