Posted on 11/02/2016 12:10:43 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
|
11/02 |
11/01 |
Change |
Trump |
47.8 |
46.9 |
+ . 9 |
Clinton |
42.4 |
43.3 |
- . 9 |
(Excerpt) Read more at cesrusc.org ...
I’m am so sorry about the goofiness of your limited insight here.
But that is exactly what the Dems do. And the reason is for there not to be raised suspicions about the theft.
Please try to think a little more clearly and open-mindedly before zipping off simple-minded insults.
Now tell me where I’m wrong.
A stupid poll doesn’t cover for fraud. It happens or it doesn’t.
It isnt eve logical, just some nonsense passed around to the point where people just think it makes sense.
“hey there was voting fraud, judge! Why? Because this CNN poll was created to hide it!”
You are being an idiot if that’s what you think.
There aren’t any legal cases re: fraud without hard evidence found. And the less suspicions are raised the less evidence is found.
I think I know better to try to argue further with your level of logic or “sense”.
tl;dr
You don’t have the slightest damn clue.
But you got the wannabe intellectual act down.
“Notice how the press just would not let go of pussygate? They were forced to stretch it out as long as they could, because they had nothing else.”
Headed by Megyn Kelly who ran with the story day after day. She may still be going with for all I know.
Going by history, I think you’ve got a reasoned point to make there.
This time, I think it’s different. There’s just too much corruption and I think the powers that be know there needs to be the perception that justice was served.
So guess who’s going to be thrown under the bus now.
Hillary, Bill, and a number of others.
This government, even in a corrupted state, needs to keep up the pretense of law and order. That’s the only way they can go back to doing stuff behind the scenes again.
That’s my take on it.
Keep your eyes on Kamala Harris of California. She’s going to beat Sanchez and be the next Senator, the identical springboard Obama used, albeit from a different state. She’s young, attractive (for a politician), black, and female. Mark my words she’s being groomed to be the next up to continue jug ears’ “legacy.”
That’s why I’m voting for Loretta Sanchez.
She’s likely to stay put.
I had planned to write in Larry Elder but I’ve been toying with going with Sanchez. I’ve never voted for a Dem in my life so I just don’t know.
Me either.
Just voting to prevent Kamala’s ascent.
I’ve hated Kamala since she was in SF.
Yes, she looks very Obama like and the similarities are striking. Attractive, smooth talker, sound moderate while you are a flaming leftist. I wish both of them could lose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.