No one in Clinton campaign, the media or the Democrat Party has been truthful about Clintons many criminal activities.
It is only through leaks that we can find out any truthful information.
There is more evidence of criminal activities in the latest leaks.
1 posted on
11/01/2016 8:46:35 AM PDT by
detective
To: detective
2 posted on
11/01/2016 8:47:45 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
To: detective
3 posted on
11/01/2016 8:47:50 AM PDT by
stocksthatgoup
(When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
To: detective
Saw podesta on cnn with tapper on Sunday.....dude was hyperventilating. Stuttering and stammering, it was a trip. Oh what a tangled web we weave.......
5 posted on
11/01/2016 8:50:44 AM PDT by
V_TWIN
To: detective
JUST ASK HER.
She said she asked for, and was granted permission to use a private server.
BY WHO????????????????????????????????
Can’t ANYONE in the media formulate the most basic of questions?
6 posted on
11/01/2016 8:51:06 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
To: detective
So if your the head of a cabinet position, all you have to do is hire a trusted underling to approve whatever you want to do?
7 posted on
11/01/2016 8:51:24 AM PDT by
GMMC0987
To: detective
And Mills so conveniently has immunity.
8 posted on
11/01/2016 8:51:44 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(Trump/Pence or Crooked Hillary & Kreepy, The Pedo Klown)
To: detective
which is why Comey-Lynch gave her IMMUNITY
and then destroyed the computers
to keep them from the US Congress.
9 posted on
11/01/2016 8:52:12 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: detective
The first email in this chain is the one that I’ve been focusing on. I’d venture that nobody gave her freakin’ permission to do this, she just did it.
To: detective
Maybe Cheryl mistakenly thought that being a Black woman, helping out a White sister, she had authority to approve such a breach of National Security protocols.
If Hillary tries to run with this it's even more evidence of how unfit she is with our security.
13 posted on
11/01/2016 8:56:41 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: detective
Cheryl Mills has always struck me as braun dead.
14 posted on
11/01/2016 8:57:42 AM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I Love Bull Markets!!!)
To: detective
WTF authority did Cheryl Mills have to approve the use of a private server for the Secretary of State?
Mills was/is Hillary’s legal counsel not a State Department functionary, at best she could merely advise not “approve” as in allow that use.
More and more it becomes evident that the Clinton’s did in fact constitute a shadow government.
15 posted on
11/01/2016 8:58:36 AM PDT by
Covenantor
(Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
To: detective
I'm sitting here imagining all the difficulties and paranoia the corrupt in D.C. must be having just to communicate. They now know nearly everything they send electronically is or has been hacked/monitored. Have they been forced to go back back to sending postal letters or only in-person meetings?☺
16 posted on
11/01/2016 8:58:47 AM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: detective
During Watergate, the $64,000 question was “what did the President know, and when did he know it?” The question about Hillary’s situation is “why would she want a private server in the first place unless it was to do something that allowed her to avoid oversight by others?”
20 posted on
11/01/2016 9:01:45 AM PDT by
Sans-Culotte
(Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
To: detective
I read more articles from “Law Newz” and I wonder if it is a decent, truthful source. I think it is severely slanted pro-Hillary. Much too slanted and not a word about Huma.
22 posted on
11/01/2016 9:03:45 AM PDT by
Bodega
(elective, therapeutic abortion sequelae)
To: detective
28 posted on
11/01/2016 9:19:44 AM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
To: detective
“you’d be in jail”
Quote of the election, possibly the decade.
30 posted on
11/01/2016 9:28:23 AM PDT by
Ouchthatonehurt
("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
To: detective
Mills appears to be an un-indicted co-conspirator and therefore there should be no attorney-client privilege.
31 posted on
11/01/2016 9:34:39 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
To: detective
What would be the motivation in the first place to set up a sysytem to have your work emails carefully routed outside of the work environments IT system?
Especially when your job involves handling secret and sensitive information?
Would anyone WANT that responsibility?
I wouldn’t
33 posted on
11/01/2016 9:50:01 AM PDT by
HereInTheHeartland
(I don't want better government; I want much less of it.)
To: detective
Should these criminals be making Supreme Court appointments?
34 posted on
11/01/2016 10:29:45 AM PDT by
Fido969
To: detective
![](http://www.collectoons.com/imgtoon/701/702/20100101_121507chode.gif)
and they're ALL lawyers!
36 posted on
11/01/2016 5:15:08 PM PDT by
Chode
(You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson