Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No one in Clinton campaign, the media or the Democrat Party has been truthful about Clintons many criminal activities.

It is only through leaks that we can find out any truthful information.

There is more evidence of criminal activities in the latest leaks.

1 posted on 11/01/2016 8:46:35 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: detective

bkmk


2 posted on 11/01/2016 8:47:45 AM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Mills Meets Bus


3 posted on 11/01/2016 8:47:50 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Saw podesta on cnn with tapper on Sunday.....dude was hyperventilating. Stuttering and stammering, it was a trip. Oh what a tangled web we weave.......


5 posted on 11/01/2016 8:50:44 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

JUST ASK HER.

She said she asked for, and was granted permission to use a private server.

BY WHO????????????????????????????????

Can’t ANYONE in the media formulate the most basic of questions?


6 posted on 11/01/2016 8:51:06 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

So if your the head of a cabinet position, all you have to do is hire a trusted underling to approve whatever you want to do?


7 posted on 11/01/2016 8:51:24 AM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

And Mills so conveniently has immunity.


8 posted on 11/01/2016 8:51:44 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Trump/Pence or Crooked Hillary & Kreepy, The Pedo Klown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

which is why Comey-Lynch gave her IMMUNITY
and then destroyed the computers
to keep them from the US Congress.


9 posted on 11/01/2016 8:52:12 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

The first email in this chain is the one that I’ve been focusing on. I’d venture that nobody gave her freakin’ permission to do this, she just did it.


11 posted on 11/01/2016 8:56:00 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
Maybe Cheryl mistakenly thought that being a Black woman, helping out a White sister, she had authority to approve such a breach of National Security protocols.

If Hillary tries to run with this it's even more evidence of how unfit she is with our security.

13 posted on 11/01/2016 8:56:41 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Cheryl Mills has always struck me as braun dead.


14 posted on 11/01/2016 8:57:42 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

WTF authority did Cheryl Mills have to approve the use of a private server for the Secretary of State?

Mills was/is Hillary’s legal counsel not a State Department functionary, at best she could merely advise not “approve” as in allow that use.

More and more it becomes evident that the Clinton’s did in fact constitute a shadow government.


15 posted on 11/01/2016 8:58:36 AM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
I'm sitting here imagining all the difficulties and paranoia the corrupt in D.C. must be having just to communicate. They now know nearly everything they send electronically is or has been hacked/monitored. Have they been forced to go back back to sending postal letters or only in-person meetings?☺
16 posted on 11/01/2016 8:58:47 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

During Watergate, the $64,000 question was “what did the President know, and when did he know it?” The question about Hillary’s situation is “why would she want a private server in the first place unless it was to do something that allowed her to avoid oversight by others?”


20 posted on 11/01/2016 9:01:45 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Time to get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

I read more articles from “Law Newz” and I wonder if it is a decent, truthful source. I think it is severely slanted pro-Hillary. Much too slanted and not a word about Huma.


22 posted on 11/01/2016 9:03:45 AM PDT by Bodega (elective, therapeutic abortion sequelae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Cornered rats in play.


28 posted on 11/01/2016 9:19:44 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Vote Trump. Defeat the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Reset America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

“you’d be in jail”
Quote of the election, possibly the decade.


30 posted on 11/01/2016 9:28:23 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt ("When you're going through hell, keep going." - Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Mills appears to be an un-indicted co-conspirator and therefore there should be no attorney-client privilege.


31 posted on 11/01/2016 9:34:39 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

What would be the motivation in the first place to set up a sysytem to have your work emails carefully routed outside of the work environments IT system?
Especially when your job involves handling secret and sensitive information?
Would anyone WANT that responsibility?

I wouldn’t


33 posted on 11/01/2016 9:50:01 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I don't want better government; I want much less of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective

Should these criminals be making Supreme Court appointments?


34 posted on 11/01/2016 10:29:45 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: detective
and they're ALL lawyers!
36 posted on 11/01/2016 5:15:08 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson