Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/27/2016 5:49:47 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki; Jeff Head

Chi-Ping


2 posted on 10/27/2016 5:50:24 AM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“The Shkval torpedo remains one of the top-secret Russian military designs.”

Yes there is a picture of it


3 posted on 10/27/2016 5:52:47 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If history proves anything at all, it’s that governments are always fighting the last war.

World War III, now in its twentieth year, is a fight of ideologies, and the West is losing. Badly.


4 posted on 10/27/2016 5:53:04 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Guess they gave up on the liquid fueled version after the Kursk disaster.
5 posted on 10/27/2016 5:54:15 AM PDT by GT Vander (Life's priorities; God, Family, Country. Everything else is just details...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Actually, if I wanted a carrier killer, it would be one like the Chinese are supposed to have, OR a long range skimmer drone that drops trou (wings) and becomes a superfast torpedo in the end game totally switching from detection, positioning and targeting to a completely different mode.

If it is at all nuke capable, the carrier would be dead.


6 posted on 10/27/2016 5:59:28 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

My question is why we don’t already have such a weapon?


7 posted on 10/27/2016 6:20:31 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (Remember that time the holier than nows caused the loss our 2nd ammendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Designing? Bet they already have it.


12 posted on 10/27/2016 7:17:25 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It looks like the first three bells produce a robust gas jacket around the torpedo, and the fourth one (the front one) can be tilted for steering, like the swash plate in a helicopter rotor. You can see one of two actuating rods, the other is blocked from view.

The front one must produce an intentional asymmetry in the gas jacket, allowing for some directional control. It’s probably not very much but — at the speeds that thing is supposed to move — you wouldn’t need very much.


13 posted on 10/27/2016 7:18:27 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki; Jeff Head
Sounds like the carrier-killer torpedo in Jeff Head's "Dragon's Fury"
14 posted on 10/27/2016 7:22:01 AM PDT by BlueLancer ("If the present tries to sit in judgment on the past, it will lose the future." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That’s it then, cancel every future carrier build project. Lets go home. The Navy is finished. Obsolete. Let drones take care of us. /sarc


15 posted on 10/27/2016 7:23:09 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson