ANNOUNCEMENT
The Washington Post has taken a powerful dose of truth. Not nearly up to speed with the forum, but enough to unravel the Clintons’ aura of invicibility.
Quotes are from the article:
— “Spokesmen for Bill Clinton and Chelsea Clinton and the foundation declined to comment.”
— “We have dedicated ourselves to helping the President secure and engage in for-profit activities,” Band wrote [in leaked memo]
Here is a vindication of Rush Limbaugh:
“Band wrote that Teneo partners had raised in excess of $8 million for the foundation and $3 million in paid speaking fees for Bill Clinton. He said he had secured contracts for the former president that would pay out $66 million over the subsequent nine years if the deals remained in place.”
Emphasis: ‘ ... if the deals remained in place ... ‘
Boycott Coca Cola until they denounce Clinton corruption: “Coke had contributed $4.33 million to the foundation between 2004 and 2010.”
Rush had pointed out that the Clintons had made a lot of promises to their cronies in exchange for money [or what people now call ‘pay to play’].
UBS Global Wealth Management — another rube.
Laureate International Universities also part of Band’s activities.
[Washington Post failed to pointed out how Laureate ripped off students.]
“Clinton has credited Band with conceiving of the Clinton Global Initiative ...” [So Band is indeed a major player.]
And Band formed Teneo.
Now for Hillary’s State Department: “... according to a separate June 2011 memo that Band wrote to the State Department seeking ethics approval for the former president’s employment ...”
“Bill Clinton was initially paid $2 million by Teneo, according to ‘Man of the World,’ a book written with the former president’s participation by author Joe Conason ...”
Now Chelsea:
“According to emails released by WikiLeaks, Chelsea Clinton complained in December 2011 to longtime Clinton aide John Podesta, who at the time was serving as an adviser to the Clinton Foundation, that she had been informed that a member of her father’s office staff who answered to Band had been making calls to British lawmakers ‘on behalf of President Clinton’ for Teneo clients, particularly for the chief executive of Dow Chemical.
Chelsea Clinton wrote that the calls were occurring without her father’s knowledge and that the reactions she was hearing to them would ‘horrify’ Bill Clinton. In another email, she wrote she feared Teneo was ‘hustling business at CGI.’”
Band gets so furious with the ‘spoiled brat’ [as he calls her] that he points out how Bill Clinton gets much less scrutiny:
“Band complained that no similar scrutiny was being applied to Bill Clinton himself. Band noted that he had previously signed a conflict of interest document for CGI.”
Band: “Oddly, WJC does not have to sign such a document even though he is personally paid by 3 cgi sponsors, gets many expensive gifts from them, some that are at home etc.”
Back to Hillary:
“Band outlined that Kelly, his Teneo co-founder, had served simultaneously between 2009 and 2011 as an unpaid economic envoy to Northern Ireland appointed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and as head of a separate consulting company whose clients included Coke, UBS and Dow. Band wrote that the arrangement was consistent with Kelly’s State Department ethics agreement.
Kelly’s multiple roles came together during one State Department event in 2010, when then-Secretary Clinton recognized Dow, among other companies, for creating jobs in Northern Ireland and thanked Kelly for his work on the issue. Dow became one of Teneo’s first major clients.”
“But the spike raised red flags for an internal company fraud investigator, who expressed alarm that it may be linked to Bill Clinton’s work with a charity founded by Liveris — a charge the company denied. ‘It appears Dow is paying Teneo for connections with Clinton,’ the investigator wrote.”
This scandal is growing... if the Russians were involved in leaking these emails or not. THE FACT IS THEY EXPOSE THE CLINTON CRIME FAMILY!!!
ITEM---Quoting Wall Street whistleblower Charles Ortel, a former managing director of Dillon, Read & Co opined: "under New York law, tax authorities don't have to show criminal intent to get convictions against foundation officials."
" Authorities need only show that the Clinton Foundation filed materially misleading financial information but kept on fundraising for a myriad of do-good projects."
<><> ITEM---The criminal element's MO to hide larger crimes is to falsify official documents.
Ortel has noted that state AG's could shut down the C/F (same way 25 state A/G's stopped Obama's immigration E/O's.)
=========================================
<><> ITEM----The legal culpability of a tax-free "charity" consists of:
<><> soliciting and taking money, and,
<><> showing how they spend it.
==========================================
REPORT MAIL FRAUD AND ELECTRONIC FRAUD HERE:
MAIL FRAUD https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
ELECTRONIC FRAUD---FBI electronic fraud unit--FBI tip page
The “real” reason that the Clinton’s haven’t been investigated properly is probably because any federal prosecutor would look at the case and run like hell. There are are so many crimes it would require thousands of investigators YEARS to collect all the facts and evidence to bring it to trial and a corrupt judge would just mouth “thank you” to Hillary for the payoff and dismiss the case.