You seem “fascinated by sex.”
They moved. And they'll move out of state if this passes, so if you want to cost the state a bunch of jobs cause it's an unsavory industry you don't like, vote yes.
even the liberal federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law as constitutional.
They upheld it cause they ARE liberal not in spite of it. It's not constitutional, it's none of the governments business. Nanny state.
If VD is a concern the much bigger problem is unchecked faggotry, not "actors" who are constantly tested.
I think Tom McClintock says it clearly, and succinctly, “Proposition 60 – Lights, Condoms, Action: NO. This one proves there is no end to the minutiae that occupies the minds of today’s public nannies — it requires “actors” in pornographic films to wear condoms. Enough said.”