To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
If Hannity hadn’t constantly butted in, and had just let Roven talk, we’d know a lot more.
2 posted on
10/25/2016 1:21:56 PM PDT by
Tucker39
(Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
To: Tucker39
Were you yelling at the TV telling Hannity to shut up and let the guy talk too?
3 posted on
10/25/2016 1:22:56 PM PDT by
libertarian27
(FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
To: Tucker39
This is what’s also frustrating about Alex Jones.
4 posted on
10/25/2016 1:24:53 PM PDT by
HokieMom
(Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
To: Tucker39
.
>> “If Hannity hadnt constantly butted in, and had just let Roven talk, wed know a lot more.” <<
That’s what Hannity is paid to do.
So many here just have no grasp of what Hannity is.
.
5 posted on
10/25/2016 1:26:01 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: Tucker39
I think Sean was frustrated with this guy. To me, he talked a lot but said nothing of substance. He was vey evasive.
6 posted on
10/25/2016 1:33:15 PM PDT by
surrey
To: Tucker39
If Hannity hadnt constantly butted in, and had just let Roven talk, wed know a lot more.But then he wouldn't be Hannity! Even though his heart is in the right place that's the main reason I find his show to be unwatchable.
9 posted on
10/25/2016 1:35:11 PM PDT by
pgkdan
(The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson