Posted on 10/25/2016 1:17:41 PM PDT by Hillary'sMoralVoid
There are four 15-minute audio segments of the article, rather poorly read, but interesting.
Jeff Roven clearly had his act together and kept very thorough records of his activities. I was amazed at the amount of information provided, some of which I hadn't heard before, and some that added more depth to things I was already aware of.
Roven's Hannity appearance really didn't do justice to all that was revealed in the article. Worth a listen IMHO.
If Hannity hadn’t constantly butted in, and had just let Roven talk, we’d know a lot more.
Were you yelling at the TV telling Hannity to shut up and let the guy talk too?
This is what’s also frustrating about Alex Jones.
.
>> “If Hannity hadn’t constantly butted in, and had just let Roven talk, we’d know a lot more.” <<
That’s what Hannity is paid to do.
So many here just have no grasp of what Hannity is.
.
I think Sean was frustrated with this guy. To me, he talked a lot but said nothing of substance. He was vey evasive.
Way to go Hannity! You turned your bombshell into a total dud!
Hannity blew a MAJOR opportunity.
Never have I seen a man so gifted so utterly botch something with such potential.
HANNITY = IDIOT.
But then he wouldn't be Hannity! Even though his heart is in the right place that's the main reason I find his show to be unwatchable.
I want to read text. It’s way more efficient than watching video.
Hannity is only useful in the last months of runup to a major election and only because he has interesting guests on the show (radio only, I don’t watch TV).
.
A born “yes man.”
Rupert’s lap dog.
.
Bookmark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.