Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US certain that WikiLeaks is part of Putin’s propaganda machine
fudzilla.com ^ | 17 October 2016 | Nick Farrell

Posted on 10/20/2016 9:28:10 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Assange’s US hate has got the better of him

Remember the days when Wikileaks did decent work and provided a valid channel for whistleblowers? Well it looks like those days have long gone and the outfit has become a tool of Tsar Putin’s propaganda machine.

In the good-old days, Wikileaks actually was impartial and careful. Sure it tended to expose US atrocities but that was because there were more of them.

But now there is mounting evidence that the Russian government is supplying WikiLeaks with hacked emails as part of a plan to game the US election and put an oligarch friendly candidate into the White House.

While the allegations are coming from the Clinton campaign they are also being made by security companies and government officials.

One US official told CNN that the methods of the disclosures suggest Moscow is at least providing the information or is possibly directly responsible for the leaks. US intelligence officials are still investigating the degree of connection between Russia and WikiLeaks but they remain confident that Russia is behind the leaks themselves.

The Director of National Intelligence, which represents 19 US intelligence agencies including the Department of Homeland Security leveled unambiguous charges against Russia.

Meanwhile Wikileaks, or the Russians have been tipping off the Trump campaign. Roger Stone, a long-time adviser to Republican nominee Donald Trump, clearly had advance knowledge of the recent hack and publication of his emails on WikiLeaks. Of course he denied it.

Trump has called on Moscow to hack into Clinton's computers, downplayed criticism of Putin's authoritarian tendencies, tried to suggest that Russia hasn't hacked US systems and promoted foreign policy positions that jibe more closely with Moscow's than Washington's. He's relied on aides with ties to Russia and most recently, quoted and fake Russian news reports to raise questions about Clinton.

But in accepting the Russian emails, Assange has placed his organisation in a tricky place. Some of the emails are damaging to Clinton and should be looked at, but because the source is Russia, we cannot be certain if the emails are edited, taken out of context or even forged.

We are certain that a hack of the Republican servers would reveal similar emails, and if the Trump campaign server was turned over it would produce some pure comedy gold. Had WikiLeaks provided these, it would be seen as an effective tool for public information and there would have been no complaints.

Yet the fact that Assange has been unable to source this sort of material means that the Russians are not give it to him or would cut off his headline-grabbing Clinton emails gravy train. Assange might not care; he has made it pretty clear that he regards Clinton as responsible for him being locked up in the embassy – something which is his own fault. However, as a long-term policy decision that hamstrings Wikileaks and weakens the information that is presented on the site. It makes him entirely dependent on state run spying operations and propaganda efforts.

The Russians failed last week to deliver the goods on Clinton and had to publish it themselves. The information was pure Putin propaganda. At least Assange had the good sense not to release that. But it is increasingly difficult to tell what is true and what is not on WikiLeaks.

Last modified on 17 October 2016


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillary; putin; trump; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I don’t care about that. I care about the content of the emails. The media won’t cover that because they are mentioned in them too many times.


21 posted on 10/20/2016 9:38:46 AM PDT by truthluva ("Character is doing the right thing even when no one is looking"..J.C. Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They’re getting desperate to keep the WikiLeaks, Project Veritas, and National Enquirer revelations from getting any traction.


22 posted on 10/20/2016 9:39:15 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

We became the enemy to ourselves.


23 posted on 10/20/2016 9:39:36 AM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I would just like to take a moment here and say to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton something Obama said to Mitt Romney in 2012:

"The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back."

Carry on!

24 posted on 10/20/2016 9:40:20 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

the corrupt obama/clinton regieme and its apparatchik media lackeys believe this, i don’t think the us believes it except for the dumbass libtards who can’t handle the truth


25 posted on 10/20/2016 9:40:49 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It’s not the US that sees Assange as a Russian tool.

It is the DEMOCRATS.


26 posted on 10/20/2016 9:41:00 AM PDT by MortMan (Moderate muslims, please identify the specific prohibitions against violent jihad in the koran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
Wiki leaks is still exposing corruption in America. The reason these morons don't like it now is because it's exposing the democrats, Clinton's and media corruption and collusion. I don't know who wrote this garbage but it sounds like it was written by the filthy Clinton campaign.
27 posted on 10/20/2016 9:42:01 AM PDT by peeps36 (Obama = the skidmark on America's underwear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

When are people going to realize it’s not WHO leaked the e-mails...What is written in the e-mails is the important part....


28 posted on 10/20/2016 9:42:08 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: truthluva

Since when did the Democratic Party become “the government?”


29 posted on 10/20/2016 9:42:13 AM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Why are the democRats so easy to hack. They have poor cyber security. Why blame the Russians for their own incompetence?


30 posted on 10/20/2016 9:43:57 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
From the article, "Trump has called on Moscow to hack into Clinton's computers".

That is an absolutely false statement. Trump never called on anyone to hack Clinton's servers which were already offline by the time he said anything about them. Trump said that if the Russian's had Hillary's deleted emails that he hoped that they would hand them over. Of course the Russian's have the emails and I am sure the Chinese, the Israelis, the North Koreans, the Iranians and a dozen other hostile foreign entities have them as well. But they are holding onto them because they will be a valuable tool to manipulate Clinton if she is elected. The proof that the Russians have nothing to do with this is that the 30,000 missing emails have not surfaced.

31 posted on 10/20/2016 9:44:29 AM PDT by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
found on twitter

32 posted on 10/20/2016 9:44:57 AM PDT by libertarian27 (FR Cookbooks - On Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

AMEN!


33 posted on 10/20/2016 9:45:09 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Just reflect on a basic...a *vital*...question.Who would Vlad Putin rather see win next month? Would it be Trump...who's made his intention to strengthen our Armed Forces plainly clear? Or would it be The Former Twelfth Lady...a woman who he's already played like a violin and who he knows is absolutely "for sale"?

It doesn't take a brain surgeon (get it? Brain surgeon...Parkinson's) to figure that one out.The Rats have put the "the Russians are gaming our election" thing to a focus group and,it would seem,they think it played well.

34 posted on 10/20/2016 9:45:17 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

35 posted on 10/20/2016 9:45:34 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theoilpainter

I have been saying from the beginning of the SOSUS email story that I presume our national security establishment is, and better be, acting under the presumption that any country with an intelligence apparatus worthy of the name has the complete contents of HRC’s illegal email server. This would be both friends and foes, numbering at least a dozen, likely more.


36 posted on 10/20/2016 9:48:21 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

FUD is right. Totally conclusory. Evidence not even described.


37 posted on 10/20/2016 9:48:58 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JBW1949

Exactly. But the Rats always pivot and camouflage the real issue, with full cooperation of the liberal media.


38 posted on 10/20/2016 9:49:25 AM PDT by entropy12 (TRUMP/PENCE 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Never heard of fudzilla.

I take it they are part of the Clinton foundation.


39 posted on 10/20/2016 9:50:11 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

To use that image is not ferret all! What were you minking?

CC


40 posted on 10/20/2016 9:50:21 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson